Understory plant response to site preparation and fertilization of loblolly and shortleaf pine forests
Issue Date
1998-01-01Keywords
choppingArkansas
subsoil
site preparation
windrowing
cultivation
interspecific competition
Pinus taeda
phosphorus fertilizers
2,4-D
Paspalum
legumes
understory
ecological succession
forest plantations
Louisiana
prescribed burning
forbs
biomass production
shrubs
Texas
Pinus
canopy
grasses
forage
soil texture
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Brockway, D. G., Wolters, G. L., Pearson, H. A., Thill, R. E., Baldwin, V. C., & Martin, A. (1998). Understory plant response to site preparation and fertilization of loblolly and shortleaf pine forests. Journal of Range Management, 51(1), 47-54.Publisher
Society for Range ManagementJournal
Journal of Range ManagementDOI
10.2307/4003563Additional Links
https://rangelands.org/Abstract
In developing an improved understanding of the dynamics of understory plant composition and productivity in Coastal Plain forest ecosystems, we examined the influence of site preparation and phosphorus fertilization on the successional trends of shrubs and herbaceous plants growing on lands of widely ranging subsoil texture in Arkansas, Louisiana, and Texas which are managed for southern pine production. Burn-inject, chop-burn, chop-burn-disk, double-chop, shear-burn, shear-windrow, and shear-windrow-disk site preparation methods were applied in a completely randomized split-plot design to sites with subsoil textures consisting of loam, gravelly-clay, silt, silty-clay, and clay, both fertilized with 73.4 kg P/ha and unfertilized. Site preparation method, subsoil texture, and fertilization influenced production of paspalums and other forbs the first growing season following treatment, but no treatment combination affected plant groups in subsequent years. Total herbaceous production increased 24 to 35-fold over pretreatment levels the first growing season after treatment. While site preparation methods had little influence on herbaceous biomass, subsoil texture affected herbaceous production the first year after treatment, with loam subsoils being most productive. Although annual composites were the most abundant herbaceous group the first year after treatment, they were largely replaced by perennial grasses by the third post-treatment growing season. By the seventh growing season following treatment, herbaceous production declined on all subsoil textures with composition and yield approximating pretreatment estimates. Subsoil texture influenced shrub density only in the first and third growing seasons after treatment. During the first few years after site preparation, herbaceous production appeared inversely related to shrub density. In the first and third post-treatment growing seasons, fertilization significantly increased total herbaceous production and biomass of composites and legumes. But 7 years after application, total herbaceous production and biomass of bluestems, other grasses, and sedges was greater on unfertilized areas. The absence of differences among treatments by the seventh post-treatment growing season indicates an overall long-term similarity in the degree of disturbance caused by application of each method in this ecosystem.Type
textArticle
Language
enISSN
0022-409Xae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.2307/4003563