Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFrancis, M. G.
dc.contributor.authorPyke, D. A.
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-23T17:46:13Z
dc.date.available2020-09-23T17:46:13Z
dc.date.issued1996-09-01
dc.identifier.citationFrancis, M. G., & Pyke, D. A. (1996). Crested wheatgrass-cheatgrass seedling competition in a mixed-density design. Journal of Range Management, 49(5), 432-438.
dc.identifier.issn0022-409X
dc.identifier.doi10.2307/4002925
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/644222
dc.description.abstractPlant competition experiments have historically used designs that are difficult to interpret due to confounding problems. Recently, designs based on a "response function" approach have been proposed and tested in various plant mixture settings. For this study, 3 species were used that are important in current revegetation practices in the Intermountain West. 'Nordan' ('Agropyron desertorum [Fish. ex Link] Shult.) and 'Hycrest' (A. cristatum [L.] Gaertn. X desertorum) crested wheatgrass are commonly-used revegetation species on rangelands susceptible to cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum L.) invasion, although little quantitative data exist that compare their competitive abilities. We evaluated the competitive ability of Hycrest and Nordan seedlings in 2-species mixtures with cheatgrass in a greenhouse study. Linear and nonlinear models were developed for a range of densities (130-520 seeds m-2) for each species to predict median above-ground biomass and tiller numbers and to further test the usefulness of this design for evaluating species to rehabilitate rangelands. In both experiments, increasing Hycrest and Nordan densities reduced their own biomass and tiller production while increasing Hycrest densities reduced cheatgrass biomass and tiller production. Nordan did not affect cheatgrass biomass and tiller production. However, increasing cheatgrass densities reduced Hycrest and Nordan biomass and tiller production, and its own biomass and tiller production. The competition index i.e. substitution rate, indicated that Hycrest seedlings were better competitors with cheatgrass than Nordan, although in all mixtures, cheatgrass plants were the superior competitors. Further field research using this design, where environmental inputs are less optimal and diverse, is needed to validate these results and to further evaluate the use of this approach in examining effects of intra- and interspecific competition.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSociety for Range Management
dc.relation.urlhttps://rangelands.org/
dc.rightsCopyright © Society for Range Management.
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectrevegetation plants
dc.subjectcompetitive ability
dc.subjectAgropyron desertorum
dc.subjectseedlings
dc.subjectBromus tectorum
dc.subjectbiomass production
dc.subjectland restoration
dc.subjectplant density
dc.subjectplant competition
dc.titleCrested wheatgrass-cheatgrass seedling competition in a mixed-density design
dc.typetext
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Range Management
dc.description.collectioninformationThe Journal of Range Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.description.admin-noteMigrated from OJS platform August 2020
dc.source.volume49
dc.source.issue5
dc.source.beginpage432-438
refterms.dateFOA2020-09-23T17:46:13Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
9146-9027-1-PB.pdf
Size:
859.5Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record