Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLacey, J. R.
dc.contributor.authorSheley, R. L.
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-23T17:51:20Z
dc.date.available2020-09-23T17:51:20Z
dc.date.issued1996-07-01
dc.identifier.citationLacey, J. R., & Sheley, R. L. (1996). Leafy spurge and grass response to picloram and intensive grazing. Journal of Range Management, 49(4), 311-314.
dc.identifier.issn0022-409X
dc.identifier.doi10.2307/4002588
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/644279
dc.description.abstractMore information about the effects of combining intensive livestock grazing of noxious weeds and associated desirable plants with other control measures is needed to develop effective rangeland weed management strategies. We studied the response of leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula L.) and Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.) to intensive short-duration grazing by either sheep or cattle, in combination with picloram (4-amino-3,5,6-trichloropicolinic acid) for 5 years. In the first year, 2 pastures (16 and 24-ha) were split into 3 blocks and picloram was applied to one-half of each block at a rate of 0.9 kg ha-1. Exclosures were established to include both treated and untreated portions in each block. The smaller and larger pastures were grazed by sheep and cattle, respectively. There were 1 or 2 grazing periods per year, varying from 1- to 2-days in length. Leafy spurge stem densities were counted annually, and grass cover and plant biomass were also examined. Data from each pasture (cattle or sheep) were analyzed separately using analyses of variance. Leafy spurge was selectively grazed by sheep, and stem densities were reduced by sheep grazing (P < 0.01). Cattle did not utilize leafy spurge and stem densities were not affected. Picloram reduced leafy spurge stem densities throughout the study in both the sheep (P < 0.001) and cattle (P < 0.001) pastures. Picloram also reduced leafy spurge biomass in the sheep pasture (P < 0.05), which allowed an increase in Kentucky bluegrass biomass. Grazing X picloram interactions affecting either leafy spurge stem densities or leafy spurge biomass were not detected. An integrated leafy spurge management system may require a longer time frame, additional control measures, and (or) more intensive grazing management.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSociety for Range Management
dc.relation.urlhttps://rangelands.org/
dc.rightsCopyright © Society for Range Management.
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectEuphorbia esula
dc.subjectPoa pratensis
dc.subjectrain
dc.subjectselective grazing
dc.subjectspecies differences
dc.subjectsheep
dc.subjectcattle
dc.subjectplant density
dc.subjectpicloram
dc.subjectbiomass
dc.subjectMontana
dc.subjectgrazing
dc.subjectfeeding preferences
dc.titleLeafy spurge and grass response to picloram and intensive grazing
dc.typetext
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Range Management
dc.description.collectioninformationThe Journal of Range Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.description.admin-noteMigrated from OJS platform August 2020
dc.source.volume49
dc.source.issue4
dc.source.beginpage311-314
refterms.dateFOA2020-09-23T17:51:20Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
9126-9007-1-PB.pdf
Size:
484.8Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record