Mountain big sagebrush browse decreases dry matter intake, digestibility, and nutritive quality of sheep diets
Issue Date
1995-11-01Keywords
urinenitrogen balance
feces
chemical composition
voluntary intake
hay
digestibility
Wyoming
Artemisia tridentata
sheep
nitrogen content
dry matter
feed intake
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Ngugi, R. K., Hinds, F. C., & Powell, J. (1995). Mountain big sagebrush browse decreases dry matter intake, digestibility, and nutritive quality of sheep diets. Journal of Range Management, 48(6), 487-492.Publisher
Society for Range ManagementJournal
Journal of Range ManagementDOI
10.2307/4003057Additional Links
https://rangelands.org/Abstract
A metabolism study evaluated the influence of increasing quantities (0-30% dry matter basis) of mountain big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana Rydb. Beetle) on dry matter intake and in vivo digestibility of wether diets. Diets consisted of hand-harvested, coarse-ground and frozen current year's growth of mountain big sagebrush leaves and twig tips mixed with chopped native grass hay. Dry matter intake decreased from 93 to 23 g dry matter day-1 kg metabolic weight-1 and in vivo dry matter digestibility from 59 to 0% with increasing levels of sagebrush in the diet. With increasing levels of sagebrush in the diet, water, lignin, and nitrogen contents increased in the diet, but decreased in the dung, while fiber components decreased in both the diet and dung. Total nitrogen intake decreased from 1.58+/-0.041 to 0.406+/-0.070 g day-1 kg metabolic weight-1, and nitrogen retention decreased from 0.80 g day-1 kg metabolic weight-1 with no sagebrush to a slight loss of nitrogen with 30% sagebrush in the diet. Mountain big sagebrush was not readily consumed by wethers when fed together with grass; as low as 10% sagebrush in the diet seems to adversely influence intake and digestibility. Therefore, when other more favorable forages are not available, sheep and other ruminants with similar physiological responses to mountain big sagebrush may not meet their nutrient requirements through increased sagebrush consumption.Type
textArticle
Language
enISSN
0022-409Xae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.2307/4003057