Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSchacht, W. H.
dc.contributor.authorStubbendieck, J.
dc.contributor.authorBragg, T. B.
dc.contributor.authorSmart, A. J.
dc.contributor.authorDoran, J. W.
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-23T18:10:11Z
dc.date.available2020-09-23T18:10:11Z
dc.date.issued1996-09-01
dc.identifier.citationSchacht, W. H., Stubbendieck, J., Bragg, T. B., Smart, A. J., & Doran, J. W. (1996). Soil quality response of reestablished grasslands to mowing and burning. Journal of Range Management, 49(5), 458-463.
dc.identifier.issn0022-409X
dc.identifier.doi10.2307/4002930
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/644330
dc.description.abstractPrescribed burning and mowing are management practices commonly used on grasslands even though there is limited knowledge of long-term effects on soil quality. The influences of mowing and burning on soil quality were determined on 2 reestablished tallgrass sites in eastern Nebraska dominated by silty clay loam soils. Burn treatments included seasonal (i.e., October, May, or July) prescribed burning at either 1-year or 4-year intervals. Mow treatments included seasonal mowing at 4-year intervals. Both burn and mow treatments have been imposed at Site 1 since fall 1981. Only the burn treatments have been applied at Site 2 since fall 1979. Soil quality measurement were made at both sites in summer 1994. Season of application of the mow and burn treatments and season X treatment interactions were not significant. Infiltration rates at Site 1 for the mow and annual burn treatments were slower than for the control, whereas infiltration rate was comparable for the year burn treatments and the control. Unlike Site 1, the 1-year and 4-year burn treatments at Site 2 had similar infiltration rates, and the burn treatments had slower infiltration rates than the control. Generally, soil bulk density, pH, electrical conductivity, total nitrogen content, and organic matter content were similar for all treatments. Results demonstrate that repeated burning or mowing treatments can detrimentally impact infiltration rates on silty clay loam sites; however, soil properties other than those measured would need to be studied to explain infiltration response.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSociety for Range Management
dc.relation.urlhttps://rangelands.org/
dc.rightsCopyright © Society for Range Management.
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectmowing
dc.subjectsoil organic matter
dc.subjectsoil density
dc.subjectelectrical conductivity
dc.subjecthighlands
dc.subjectsoil pH
dc.subjectloam soils
dc.subjectNebraska
dc.subjectprescribed burning
dc.subjectnitrogen content
dc.subjectrange management
dc.subjectinfiltration
dc.subjectbulk density
dc.titleSoil quality response of reestablished grasslands to mowing and burning
dc.typetext
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Range Management
dc.description.collectioninformationThe Journal of Range Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.description.admin-noteMigrated from OJS platform August 2020
dc.source.volume49
dc.source.issue5
dc.source.beginpage458-463
refterms.dateFOA2020-09-23T18:10:11Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
9151-9032-1-PB.pdf
Size:
706.3Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record