Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMohammad, A. G.
dc.contributor.authorPieper, R. D.
dc.contributor.authorWallace, J. D.
dc.contributor.authorHolechek, J. L.
dc.contributor.authorMurray, L. W.
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-23T18:31:22Z
dc.date.available2020-09-23T18:31:22Z
dc.date.issued1995-05-01
dc.identifier.citationMohammad, A. G., Pieper, R. D., Wallace, J. D., Holechek, J. L., & Murray, L. W. (1995). Comparison of fecal analysis and rumen evacuation techniques for sampling diet botanical composition of grazing cattle. Journal of Range Management, 48(3), 202-205.
dc.identifier.issn0022-409X
dc.identifier.doi10.2307/4002421
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/644373
dc.description.abstractFecal samples, evacuated rumen samples, and non-evacuated rumen samples were compared at different seasons as techniques for determining diet botanical composition of cattle. The study was conducted at the New Mexico State University College Ranch near Las Cruces. Six rumen-fistulated steers were used spring (28 May-7 June), summer (19 July-8 August). fall 1989 (1-17 October), winter (8-28 January) 1990; 4 rumen-fistulated steers were used during summer (24 July-4 August) 1990. Sampling techniques differed (P < 0.05) for the proportion of some plant species in steer diets at certain seasons. In most cases, these differences were observed only for minor forage species. Similarity (%) between fecal samples, evacuated rumen samples, and non-evacuated rumen samples varied with season and with the particular techniques being compared. Similarity (%) between fecal samples and evacuated rumen samples (74%), and highest in summer (1989) between fecal samples and non-evacuated rumen samples (93%). Differential digestion, sampling procedures, and observer errors may explain these differences. For practical purposes, fecal analysis appears to be one of the best techniques to evaluate diet composition of large herbivores.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSociety for Range Management
dc.relation.urlhttps://rangelands.org/
dc.rightsCopyright © Society for Range Management.
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectfistulation
dc.subjectrumen contents
dc.subjectfeces composition
dc.subjectsampling
dc.subjectseasonal variation
dc.subjectbotanical composition
dc.subjectgrazing
dc.subjectNew Mexico
dc.subjectbeef cattle
dc.titleComparison of fecal analysis and rumen evacuation techniques for sampling diet botanical composition of grazing cattle
dc.typetext
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Range Management
dc.description.collectioninformationThe Journal of Range Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.description.admin-noteMigrated from OJS platform August 2020
dc.source.volume48
dc.source.issue3
dc.source.beginpage202-205
refterms.dateFOA2020-09-23T18:31:22Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
9014-8895-1-PB.pdf
Size:
476.5Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record