Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBastian, C. T.
dc.contributor.authorJacobs, J. J.
dc.contributor.authorSmith, M. A.
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-23T18:34:44Z
dc.date.available2020-09-23T18:34:44Z
dc.date.issued1995-01-01
dc.identifier.citationBastian, C. T., Jacobs, J. J., & Smith, M. A. (1995). How much sagebrush is too much: An economic threshold analysis. Journal of Range Management, 48(1), 73-80.
dc.identifier.issn0022-409X
dc.identifier.doi10.2307/4002508
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/644412
dc.description.abstractMuch research concerning sagebrush control methods and forage response after control has been conducted due to the importance of sagebrush-grass dominated rangelands for livestock and wildlife in the western United States. Very little research has addressed the economic feasibility of sagebrush control at various levels of abundance. This study estimates the economic thmhold abundance of sagebrush based on forage response data from a sagebrush control experiment in Carbon County, Wyo. Forage response data are based on the difference in herbage between treated and untreated experimental units from sites ranging in initial sagebrush canopy cover from 4 to 40%. Breakeven returns per AUM were estimated for each sagebrush canopy cover level assuming 2,4-D (2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid) or burning (for 28 to 40% canopy cover) as a control method with lives of control at 1S, 20, and 25 years. These breakeven returns were compared to a net lease rate of S6.13/AUM. Results indicate the economic threshold abundance of sagebrush is 12% assuming, 2,4-D as the control method and a control longevity of 25 years, but the feasible sagebrush abundance increases as longevity of control decreases. If the longevity of the control only lasts 20 years, the sagebrush abundance must be at least 20% before treating sagebrush becomes economically feasible. If the longevity of control is only 15 years, sagebrush abundance must be at least 24% canopy cover before treatment is economically viable. Given estimates of the cost of burning are almost half that of spraying with 2,4-D, all the scenarios which had enough biomass to sustain a burn (28% to 40%) indicated sagebrush controJ by fire was economically viable.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSociety for Range Management
dc.relation.urlhttps://rangelands.org/
dc.rightsCopyright © Society for Range Management.
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectcost-benefit analysis
dc.subjecteconomic threshold
dc.subjectcontrol programs
dc.subjectbrush control
dc.subjectprescribed burning
dc.subjectWyoming
dc.subjectArtemisia tridentata
dc.subjectcanopy
dc.subjectforage
dc.titleHow much sagebrush is too much: An economic threshold analysis
dc.typetext
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Range Management
dc.description.collectioninformationThe Journal of Range Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.description.admin-noteMigrated from OJS platform August 2020
dc.source.volume48
dc.source.issue1
dc.source.beginpage73-80
refterms.dateFOA2020-09-23T18:34:44Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
8993-8874-1-PB.pdf
Size:
1.069Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record