Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBrejda, J. J.
dc.contributor.authorBrown, J. R.
dc.contributor.authorWyman, G. W.
dc.contributor.authorSchumacher, W. K.
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-23T18:35:51Z
dc.date.available2020-09-23T18:35:51Z
dc.date.issued1994-01-01
dc.identifier.citationBrejda, J. J., Brown, J. R., Wyman, G. W., & Schumacher, W. K. (1994). Management of switchgrass for forage and seed production. Journal of Range Management, 47(1), 22-27.
dc.identifier.issn0022-409X
dc.identifier.doi10.2307/4002835
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/644426
dc.description.abstractManagement of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) for both forage and seed would improve the diversity of options livestock producers have for their stands. Our objective was to evaluate how timing of the forage harvest and N applications can be used to manage switchgrass for both forage and seed from the same stand. Switchgrass forage was harvested in late May (prior to stem elongation) or mid-June (early boot stage) or left uncut and treated with either a single application of 88 kg N ha-1 in the spring or 4-weeks after green-up, or split applications of 44 kg N ha-1 in the spring and 44 kg N ha-1 following defoliation. The late May harvest gave lower yields of higher quality forage whereas the mid-june harvest produced greater yields of lower quality forage. Both the late May and mid-June harvest increased total tiller density compared to uncut plots, but a mid-June harvest decreased reproductive tiller density. Application of N following defoliation increased both total tiller density and reproductive tiller density but the response was small with a mid-June harvest. A mid-June harvest reduced both seed yield and 100-seed weights all 3 years. A late May harvest reduced same-year seed yields and 100-seed weights in 1991 only, when the harvest was taken after stem elongation had initiated. Application of N following defoliation stimulated plant regrowth, enhancing same-year seed yield. Harvesting switchgrass for forage in the spring prior to stem elongation followed by a post-harvest N application of 44 kg N ha-1 allows producers to manage switchgrass for both forage and seed.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSociety for Range Management
dc.relation.urlhttps://rangelands.org/
dc.rightsCopyright © Society for Range Management.
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectseed quality
dc.subjectseed production
dc.subjectMissouri
dc.subjectnitrogen fertilizers
dc.subjectPanicum virgatum
dc.subjecttillering
dc.subjectprecipitation
dc.subjectrange management
dc.subjectforage
dc.titleManagement of switchgrass for forage and seed production
dc.typetext
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Range Management
dc.description.noteThis material was digitized as part of a cooperative project between the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries.
dc.description.collectioninformationThe Journal of Range Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.description.admin-noteMigrated from OJS platform August 2020
dc.source.volume47
dc.source.issue1
dc.source.beginpage22-27
refterms.dateFOA2020-09-23T18:35:51Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
8896-8777-1-PB.pdf
Size:
732.0Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record