Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMilchunas, D. G.
dc.contributor.authorForwood, J. R.
dc.contributor.authorLauenroth, W. K.
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-23T18:44:27Z
dc.date.available2020-09-23T18:44:27Z
dc.date.issued1994-03-01
dc.identifier.citationMilchunas, D. G., Forwood, J. R., & Lauenroth, W. K. (1994). Productivity of long-term grazing treatments in response to seasonal precipitation. Journal of Range Management, 47(2), 133-139.
dc.identifier.issn0022-409X
dc.identifier.doi10.2307/4002821
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/644452
dc.description.abstractEstimates of forage production for long-term ungrazed, lightly, moderately, and heavily grazed treatments (0, 20, 40, 60% removal of annual forage production) established in 1939 in shortgrass steppe communities were subjected to multiple regression analyses to assess long-term temporal trends resulting from grazing and short-term sensitivities to abiotic factors. Average production based upon all data from 1939-1990 was 75, 71, 68, and 57 g m-2 yr-1 for ungrazed, lightly, moderately, and heavily grazed treatments, respectively. Variability in forage production was explained mostly by cool-season precipitation, and magnitude of forage production was more sensitive to annual fluctuations in precipitation than to long-term grazing treatments. Production per unit increase of precipitation was greater for cool-season than warm-season precipitation, but only when cool-season precipitation was above average. This was attributed to differences in evaporative demand of the atmosphere resulting in different utilization-efficiencies of small and large rainfall events in the 2 seasons. Based upon a regression model constructed using data from 1939 through 1962, forage production was not affected by grazing to 20 to 35% removal. For pastures of average relative productivity, grazing at 60% level of consumption for 25 years resulted in a 3% decrease in forage production in wet years and a 12% decrease in dry years. Estimates of productivity after 50 years of heavy compared to light grazing treatment were -5 and -18% for wet and average y precipitation, respectively.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSociety for Range Management
dc.relation.urlhttps://rangelands.org/
dc.rightsCopyright © Society for Range Management.
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectfluctuations
dc.subjectsteppes
dc.subjectregression analysis
dc.subjectrain
dc.subjectbiomass production
dc.subjectgrazing intensity
dc.subjectsemiarid zones
dc.subjectbotanical composition
dc.subjectColorado
dc.subjectforage
dc.titleProductivity of long-term grazing treatments in response to seasonal precipitation
dc.typetext
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Range Management
dc.description.noteThis material was digitized as part of a cooperative project between the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries.
dc.description.collectioninformationThe Journal of Range Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.description.admin-noteMigrated from OJS platform August 2020
dc.source.volume47
dc.source.issue2
dc.source.beginpage133-139
refterms.dateFOA2020-09-23T18:44:27Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
8918-8799-1-PB.pdf
Size:
934.5Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record