Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorClary, W. P.
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-23T18:48:12Z
dc.date.available2020-09-23T18:48:12Z
dc.date.issued1995-01-01
dc.identifier.citationClary, W. P. (1995). Vegetation and soil response to grazing simulation on riparian meadows. Journal of Range Management, 48(1), 18-25.
dc.identifier.issn0022-409X
dc.identifier.doi10.2307/4002499
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/644495
dc.description.abstractRiparian areas have not responded consistently to grazing systems, suggesting that more knowledge is needed to explain how different areas respond to specific stresses. Several studies were conducted to determine herbaceous plant response to simulated grazing on riparian areas. One low-elevation redtop (Agrostis stolonifera L.) site in Oregon and 2 high-elevation sedge (Carex spp. L.) sites in Idaho were studied for 3 years. Several combinations of defoliation, compaction, nutrient return, and season of use were examined. The redtop community responded to spring, fall, or spring-fall defoliations by maintaining or increasing the following year's aboveground biomass production. The sedge communities maintained or decreased the following years's biomass production after spring, mid summer, or late summer defoliations. An increase in forbs occurred in 1 sedge community following spring defoliations to 1- or 5-cm residual stubble heights. The most consistent plant response among areas was reduction in height growth and biomass production following compaction treatments. When both defoliation and compaction are considered, it appears that spring, fall, or spring and fall grazing to a 5-cm stubble height on the redtop site would not decrease riparian herbage production. In contrast, when defoliation, compaction, and nutrient return effects are considered in the mountain meadow sedge-dominated communities, grazing once annually during the growing season to a 5-cm stubble height in the spring, or to a 10-cm stubble height in late summer, or at a utilization rate exceeding 30% of the total annual biomass production can reduce herbage production significantly. Results suggest that many of the land management agency riparian guidelines would maintain biomass productivity in these sedge-dominated communities.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSociety for Range Management
dc.relation.urlhttps://rangelands.org/
dc.rightsCopyright © Society for Range Management.
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectbiogeochemical cycles
dc.subjectstreams
dc.subjectAlopecurus pratensis
dc.subjectAgrostis stolonifera
dc.subjectCarex
dc.subjectriparian buffers
dc.subjectgrazing experiments
dc.subjectIdaho
dc.subjectOregon
dc.subjectgrowth rate
dc.subjectbiomass production
dc.subjectdefoliation
dc.subjectsoil compaction
dc.subjectaltitude
dc.titleVegetation and soil response to grazing simulation on riparian meadows
dc.typetext
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Range Management
dc.description.collectioninformationThe Journal of Range Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.description.admin-noteMigrated from OJS platform August 2020
dc.source.volume48
dc.source.issue1
dc.source.beginpage18-25
refterms.dateFOA2020-09-23T18:48:12Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
8984-8865-1-PB.pdf
Size:
979.5Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record