Increasing bitterbrush nutrient quality with 2,4-D, mowing, and burning in southcentral Wyoming
Issue Date
1992-09-01Keywords
mowing2,4-D
crop quality
ash
Purshia tridentata
fires
fire effects
pastures
winter
prescribed burning
phosphorus
summer
Wyoming
in vitro digestibility
nitrogen content
range management
seasonal variation
nutritive value
forage
chemical constituents of plants
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Kituku, V. M., Powell, J., Smith, M. A., & Olson, R. A. (1992). Increasing bitterbrush nutrient quality with 2, 4-D, mowing, and burning in southcentral Wyoming. Journal of Range Management, 45(5), 488-493.Publisher
Society for Range ManagementJournal
Journal of Range ManagementDOI
10.2307/4002908Additional Links
https://rangelands.org/Abstract
Effects of burning, mowing, and 2,4-D on antelope bitterbrush (Purshia tridentata Pursh.) nutrient contents were evaluated in southcentral Wyoming. During the first growing season following treatments, spraying of 2,4-D increased bitterbrush nitrogen (N) contents from 1.5 to 1.9%, phosphorus (P) from 0.12 to 0.15%, and in vitro digestible dry matter (IVDDM) from 44.1 to 48.4%. Mowing increased N from 1.5 to 1.7%, P from 0.12 to 0.16%, and IVDDM from 44.1 to 46.1%. Burning increased N from 1.4 to 1.9%, P from 0.11 to 0.17%, ash from 3.7 to 5.3%, and IVDDM from 47.4 to 51.0%, and decreased gross energy from 4,640 to 4,380 kcal/g. There were no differences in N and IVDDM contents among treatments at the end of the second growing season, but P content was still greater in mowed bitterbrush regrowth than on untreated bitterbrush. Ash contents were not affected by treatments, but were higher in summer (3.9%) than in winter (2.4%). Gross energy contents varied only 5 to 10% among all treatments and seasons. Correlation coefficients between N, P, ash, and IVDDM contents varied from +0.54 to +0.76, and all of these nutrients were negatively correlated with gross energy. Bitterbrush nutrient contents can be increased by shrub management practices, but short-term responses require that small portions of the total area be treated annually in a rotational shrub management program.Type
textArticle
Language
enISSN
0022-409Xae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.2307/4002908