Nutrient composition of whitetop
dc.contributor.author | McInnis, M. L. | |
dc.contributor.author | Larson, L. L. | |
dc.contributor.author | Miller, R. F. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-09-23T20:17:10Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-09-23T20:17:10Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1993-05-01 | |
dc.identifier.citation | McInnis, M. L., Larson, L. L., & Miller, R. F. (1993). Nutrient composition of whitetop. Journal of Range Management, 46(3), 227-231. | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0022-409X | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.2307/4002611 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10150/644601 | |
dc.description.abstract | Whitetop or heart-podded hoary cress (Cardaria draba (L.) Desv.) is an Eurasian native of the Cruciferae actively invading rangelands throughout western North America. The plant is reported to be unpalatable to livestock and contain potentially toxic glucosinolates. Practical experience indicates sheep consume whitetop during its early growth stages and cattle ingest large quantities of seedheads. Chemical analysis of whole plants from rosette to hard seed, respectively, indicated the following trends: crude protein (28.8 to 7.9%), neutral detergent fiber (13.1 to 52.8%), acid detergent fiber (12.0 to 41.8%), cellulose (9.9 to 32.1%), lignin (1.9 to 9.4%), ether extract (1.6 to 2.4%), in vitro organic matter digestibility (77.3 to 49.1%), digestible energy (2.9 to 1.8 Mcal/kg), and total glucosinolates (28.4 to 84.0 micromoles/g). Leaves were higher than stems in crude protein, ether extract, in vitro organic matter digestibility, and digestible energy. Analysis of 11 micro- and macroelements revealed sulfur (S) levels ranged from 0.73 to 2.69% and were therefore higher than the reported maximum tolerable level (0.4%). High S levels likely reflected the S moiety of glucosinolates and their hydrolysis products. Whitetop has some forage value, but until further research establishes the toxicity of this species to sheep and cattle, prudence suggests managers use caution when allowing animals to graze whitetop-infested rangelands by providing supplemental iodine, utilizing mature and nonlactating animals, and reducing opportunities for animals to consume the plant. | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | Society for Range Management | |
dc.relation.url | https://rangelands.org/ | |
dc.rights | Copyright © Society for Range Management. | |
dc.rights.uri | http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ | |
dc.subject | Lepidium draba subsp. draba | |
dc.subject | glucosinolates | |
dc.subject | toxicity | |
dc.subject | nutrient content | |
dc.subject | poisonous weeds | |
dc.subject | pastures | |
dc.subject | sheep | |
dc.subject | cattle | |
dc.subject | in vitro digestibility | |
dc.subject | nutritive value | |
dc.subject | forage | |
dc.subject | chemical constituents of plants | |
dc.title | Nutrient composition of whitetop | |
dc.type | text | |
dc.type | Article | |
dc.identifier.journal | Journal of Range Management | |
dc.description.note | This material was digitized as part of a cooperative project between the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. | |
dc.description.collectioninformation | The Journal of Range Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information. | |
dc.eprint.version | Final published version | |
dc.description.admin-note | Migrated from OJS platform August 2020 | |
dc.source.volume | 46 | |
dc.source.issue | 3 | |
dc.source.beginpage | 227-231 | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2020-09-23T20:17:10Z |