Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMcInnis, M. L.
dc.contributor.authorLarson, L. L.
dc.contributor.authorMiller, R. F.
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-23T20:17:10Z
dc.date.available2020-09-23T20:17:10Z
dc.date.issued1993-05-01
dc.identifier.citationMcInnis, M. L., Larson, L. L., & Miller, R. F. (1993). Nutrient composition of whitetop. Journal of Range Management, 46(3), 227-231.
dc.identifier.issn0022-409X
dc.identifier.doi10.2307/4002611
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/644601
dc.description.abstractWhitetop or heart-podded hoary cress (Cardaria draba (L.) Desv.) is an Eurasian native of the Cruciferae actively invading rangelands throughout western North America. The plant is reported to be unpalatable to livestock and contain potentially toxic glucosinolates. Practical experience indicates sheep consume whitetop during its early growth stages and cattle ingest large quantities of seedheads. Chemical analysis of whole plants from rosette to hard seed, respectively, indicated the following trends: crude protein (28.8 to 7.9%), neutral detergent fiber (13.1 to 52.8%), acid detergent fiber (12.0 to 41.8%), cellulose (9.9 to 32.1%), lignin (1.9 to 9.4%), ether extract (1.6 to 2.4%), in vitro organic matter digestibility (77.3 to 49.1%), digestible energy (2.9 to 1.8 Mcal/kg), and total glucosinolates (28.4 to 84.0 micromoles/g). Leaves were higher than stems in crude protein, ether extract, in vitro organic matter digestibility, and digestible energy. Analysis of 11 micro- and macroelements revealed sulfur (S) levels ranged from 0.73 to 2.69% and were therefore higher than the reported maximum tolerable level (0.4%). High S levels likely reflected the S moiety of glucosinolates and their hydrolysis products. Whitetop has some forage value, but until further research establishes the toxicity of this species to sheep and cattle, prudence suggests managers use caution when allowing animals to graze whitetop-infested rangelands by providing supplemental iodine, utilizing mature and nonlactating animals, and reducing opportunities for animals to consume the plant.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSociety for Range Management
dc.relation.urlhttps://rangelands.org/
dc.rightsCopyright © Society for Range Management.
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectLepidium draba subsp. draba
dc.subjectglucosinolates
dc.subjecttoxicity
dc.subjectnutrient content
dc.subjectpoisonous weeds
dc.subjectpastures
dc.subjectsheep
dc.subjectcattle
dc.subjectin vitro digestibility
dc.subjectnutritive value
dc.subjectforage
dc.subjectchemical constituents of plants
dc.titleNutrient composition of whitetop
dc.typetext
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Range Management
dc.description.noteThis material was digitized as part of a cooperative project between the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries.
dc.description.collectioninformationThe Journal of Range Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.description.admin-noteMigrated from OJS platform August 2020
dc.source.volume46
dc.source.issue3
dc.source.beginpage227-231
refterms.dateFOA2020-09-23T20:17:10Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
8828-8709-1-PB.pdf
Size:
633.6Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record