Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGanskopp, D.
dc.contributor.authorAngell, R.
dc.contributor.authorRose, J.
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-23T20:18:25Z
dc.date.available2020-09-23T20:18:25Z
dc.date.issued1992-07-01
dc.identifier.citationGanskopp, D., Angell, R., & Rose, J. (1992). Response of cattle to cured reproductive stems in a caespitose grass. Journal of Range Management, 45(4), 401-404.
dc.identifier.issn0022-409X
dc.identifier.doi10.2307/4003091
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/644618
dc.description.abstractAccumulation of wolf plants in rangeland pastures frequently results in waste or incomplete utilization of high quality forage by cattle. The objective of this research was to establish the degree of sensitivity of cattle to cured stems in crested wheatgrass (Agropyron desertorum (Fischer ex Link) Schultes) at 3 stages of phenology (late-boot, anthesis, and quiescence). This was accomplished by providing individual plants having densities of 0, 3, 6, 9, or 12 cured stems per dm2 basal area and measuring frequency and degree of utilization after exposure to cattle grazing. Project design was a split-plot in a randomized complete block with 3 replications, 3 stages of phenology as whole plots, and 5 densities of stems as treatments. A significant (P<0.01) phenology X treatment interaction occurred with cattle being equally sensitive to all treat- ments containing stems at late-boot and anthesis and oblivious to their presence at quiescence. At late-boot and anthesis stages of phenology 75% of plants with no stems were grazed while only 45% of plants with stems were grazed. Respective levels of utilization from the same treatments were 25 and 8%. A negative response was exhibited by cattle during anthesis when as little as 4% of biomass was contributed by cured stems. These results suggest that old growth stems should be removed or their presence noted as a covariate when conducting palatability studies or when observing plant-specific responses to defoliation by cattle. Cattle were not sensitive to treatments at quiescence when roughly 75% of plants in all treatments were defoliated with 25% herbage removal. This suggests that heavy grazing of a pasture with an objective of obtaining utilization of wolf plants would be most successful after all forage has cured, and cattle are less selective.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSociety for Range Management
dc.relation.urlhttps://rangelands.org/
dc.rightsCopyright © Society for Range Management.
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectcrop growth stage
dc.subjectAgropyron desertorum
dc.subjectpalatability
dc.subjectgrazing behavior
dc.subjectcattle
dc.subjectplant density
dc.subjectphenology
dc.subjectforage
dc.subjectfeeding preferences
dc.titleResponse of cattle to cured reproductive stems in a caespitose grass
dc.typetext
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Range Management
dc.description.noteThis material was digitized as part of a cooperative project between the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries.
dc.description.collectioninformationThe Journal of Range Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.description.admin-noteMigrated from OJS platform August 2020
dc.source.volume45
dc.source.issue4
dc.source.beginpage401-404
refterms.dateFOA2020-09-23T20:18:25Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
8749-8630-1-PB.pdf
Size:
539.3Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record