'Hobble Creek' big sagebrush vs. antelope bitterbush as a winter forage
Issue Date
1992-03-01Keywords
monoterpenoidsPurshia tridentata
palatability
winter
Artemisia tridentata
Odocoileus hemionus
Utah
forage
feeding preferences
chemical constituents of plants
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Welch, B. L., & Wagstaff, F. J. (1992). 'Hobble Creek' big sagebrush vs. antelope bitterbush as a winter forage. Journal of Range Management, 45(2), 140-142.Publisher
Society for Range ManagementJournal
Journal of Range ManagementDOI
10.2307/4002771Additional Links
https://rangelands.org/Abstract
From a planting of antelope bitterbrush (Purshia tridentata Purshia DC) and 'Hobble Creek' mountain big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana Rydb. Beetle), pairs of plants were selected to test the following 2 hypotheses: (1) wintering mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus hemionus) prefer (as measured by percent use and/or grams of dry matter removed) 'Hobble Creek' big sagebrush over antelope bitterbrush, and (2) the winter nutrient content of 'Hobble Creek' forage exceeds that of antelope bitterbrush. Results of this study support the 2 hypotheses. 'Hobble Creek', a monoterpenoid-producing shrub, was preferred by wintering mule deer over a nonmonoterpenoid-producing shrub, antelope bitterbrush. Also, 'Hobble Creek' nutrient content was superior to that of antelope bitterbrush.Type
textArticle
Language
enISSN
0022-409Xae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.2307/4002771