Forage production of reclaimed mined lands as influenced by nitrogen fertilization and mulching practice
Issue Date
1991-07-01Keywords
annual dressingssplit dressings
crimped straw mulches
stubble mulching
ammonium nitrate
straw mulches
mined soils
reclamation
Poaceae
biomass production
Wyoming
land restoration
application rates
grasses
forage
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Schuman, G. E., Taylor, E. M., & Rauzi, F. (1991). Forage production of reclaimed mined lands as influenced by nitrogen fertilization and mulching practice. Journal of Range Management, 44(4), 382-384.Publisher
Society for Range ManagementJournal
Journal of Range ManagementDOI
10.2307/4002404Additional Links
https://rangelands.org/Abstract
Fertilizer nitrogen (N) management and other cultural practices used in reclamation can have a significant effect on the successful revegetation of mined lands. Repeated fertilization of revegetated lands creates management and economic concerns. Nitrogen fertilizer was broadcast at 67 kg ha-1 yr-1 for 4 years and at 268 ha-1 for 1 year on revegetated mined land to evaluate N management effects on forage production. Seeded grass production over 5 years did not exhibit consistent increases for the single N fertilizer application compared to the 4 annual applications. Although the single, higher N fertilization treatment only produced significantly greater forage in 3 instances compared to the lower annual fertilization treatment, it would result in a significant savings in application costs. Seeded grass production was higher and annual forb production lower when established using a standing grain stubble mulch compared to a crimped straw mulch. A single, higher application rate of nitrogen and a stubble mulch are recommended because of their production, management, and economic benefits.Type
textArticle
Language
enISSN
0022-409Xae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.2307/4002404