Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFulbright, T. E.
dc.contributor.authorGarza, A.
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-24T02:08:01Z
dc.date.available2020-09-24T02:08:01Z
dc.date.issued1991-09-01
dc.identifier.citationFulbright, T. E., & Garza, A. (1991). Forage yield and white-tailed deer diets following live oak control. Journal of Range Management, 44(5), 451-455.
dc.identifier.issn0022-409X
dc.identifier.doi10.2307/4002743
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/644713
dc.description.abstractLive oak (Quercus virginiana Mill.) competes with herbaceous plants, but provides browse and mast for white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus Zimmerman). We determined the effects of treating live oak with tebuthiuron on yield of herbaceous vegetation and white-tailed deer diets and nutritional indices. In 1982, 259 ha were aerially treated with 2.2 kg/ha active ingredient of tebuthiuron pellets in parallel, alternating treated and untreated strips, each measuring 76 m wide. A second area was treated in 1984. We clipped herbage during June and November 1985-86 within exclosures in treated and untreated strips, and determined chemical and botanical composition of rumen contents and kidney fat index (KFI) from deer killed in the 1982 strip treatment area and a control (untreated) area. Grass yield was 2-4 times higher on treated thin on untreated range. Forb yield was almost 5 times greater on range treated in 1982 than on untreated range, but yield on untreated range and areas treated in 1984 was similar. Deer sampled in the control ares had consumed more forbs than those sampled in the herbicide-stripped area except in fall 1985. The KFI was greater for deer sampled in the control area in fall 1985 and greater for those sampled in the stripped area in fall 1986. Treatment with tebuthiuron in alternating strips increased forage yield for cattle and was apparently not detrimental to KFI of deer.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSociety for Range Management
dc.relation.urlhttps://rangelands.org/
dc.rightsCopyright © Society for Range Management.
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectgrassland improvement
dc.subjectnutritional status
dc.subjectbrowse
dc.subjectQuercus virginiana
dc.subjectforaging
dc.subjecttebuthiuron
dc.subjectwoodland grasslands
dc.subjectweed control
dc.subjectyields
dc.subjectOdocoileus virginianus
dc.subjectbiomass production
dc.subjectTexas
dc.subjectbotanical composition
dc.subjectbrowsing
dc.subjectgrasses
dc.subjectforage
dc.subjectfeeding preferences
dc.titleForage yield and white-tailed deer diets following live oak control
dc.typetext
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Range Management
dc.description.noteThis material was digitized as part of a cooperative project between the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries.
dc.description.collectioninformationThe Journal of Range Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.description.admin-noteMigrated from OJS platform August 2020
dc.source.volume44
dc.source.issue5
dc.source.beginpage451-455
refterms.dateFOA2020-09-24T02:08:01Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
8641-8522-1-PB.pdf
Size:
717.9Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record