Influence of range site on diet selection and nutrient intake of cattle
Issue Date
1990-03-01Keywords
availabilitygrazing pressure
clay loam soils
nutrient intake
site factors
pastures
sandy loam soils
heifers
diets
grazing behavior
in vitro digestibility
botanical composition
nutritive value
forage
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Launchbaugh, K. L., Stuth, J. W., & Holloway, J. W. (1990). Influence of range site on diet selection and nutrient intake of cattle. Journal of Range Management, 43(2), 109-116.Publisher
Society for Range ManagementJournal
Journal of Range ManagementDOI
10.2307/3899026Additional Links
https://rangelands.org/Abstract
It is common in range science to base stocking rate estimates on range sites as units of forage production. However, little is known about how diet composition, quality, and intake may differ by range site. This study examines the influence of 2 range sites on the diet selection and nutrient intake of cattle. A sandy loam (SL) and a clay loam (CL) range site were compared in 4 seasonal, trials on an Acacia dominated, mixed-brush savanna on the Texas Rio Grande Plains. Diet composition and quality, and nutrient intake of cattle were determined throughout each 16-21 day trial using esophageally fistulated cattle and daily dosing with ytterbium acetate. The range sites differed widely in proportions of grass, forb, and browse biomass. Cattle generally selected similar diets and adjusted diets to increasing grazing pressure and decreasing forage availability in a similar manner regardless of site, except in fall when cattle selected more browse on the SL site where herbaceous forage was severely limited. Fecal output of cattle differed between sites only in fall when cattle on the SL site had lower fecal output than cattle on the CL site. Cattle on the site of lower herbaceous mass (SL site) generally achieved higher diet quality and nutrient intake during the growing season, when herbaceous forage was readily available because of greater access to green forage. Therefore, the SL site yielded higher diet quality at low grazing pressure during the growing season. Conversely, the CL site, because of its greater herbaceous mass, yielded higher nutrient intake in the fall and at high levels of grazing pressure.Type
textArticle
Language
enISSN
0022-409Xae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.2307/3899026