Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLaunchbaugh, K. L.
dc.contributor.authorStuth, J. W.
dc.contributor.authorHolloway, J. W.
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-24T02:32:17Z
dc.date.available2020-09-24T02:32:17Z
dc.date.issued1990-03-01
dc.identifier.citationLaunchbaugh, K. L., Stuth, J. W., & Holloway, J. W. (1990). Influence of range site on diet selection and nutrient intake of cattle. Journal of Range Management, 43(2), 109-116.
dc.identifier.issn0022-409X
dc.identifier.doi10.2307/3899026
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/644884
dc.description.abstractIt is common in range science to base stocking rate estimates on range sites as units of forage production. However, little is known about how diet composition, quality, and intake may differ by range site. This study examines the influence of 2 range sites on the diet selection and nutrient intake of cattle. A sandy loam (SL) and a clay loam (CL) range site were compared in 4 seasonal, trials on an Acacia dominated, mixed-brush savanna on the Texas Rio Grande Plains. Diet composition and quality, and nutrient intake of cattle were determined throughout each 16-21 day trial using esophageally fistulated cattle and daily dosing with ytterbium acetate. The range sites differed widely in proportions of grass, forb, and browse biomass. Cattle generally selected similar diets and adjusted diets to increasing grazing pressure and decreasing forage availability in a similar manner regardless of site, except in fall when cattle selected more browse on the SL site where herbaceous forage was severely limited. Fecal output of cattle differed between sites only in fall when cattle on the SL site had lower fecal output than cattle on the CL site. Cattle on the site of lower herbaceous mass (SL site) generally achieved higher diet quality and nutrient intake during the growing season, when herbaceous forage was readily available because of greater access to green forage. Therefore, the SL site yielded higher diet quality at low grazing pressure during the growing season. Conversely, the CL site, because of its greater herbaceous mass, yielded higher nutrient intake in the fall and at high levels of grazing pressure.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSociety for Range Management
dc.relation.urlhttps://rangelands.org/
dc.rightsCopyright © Society for Range Management.
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectavailability
dc.subjectgrazing pressure
dc.subjectclay loam soils
dc.subjectnutrient intake
dc.subjectsite factors
dc.subjectpastures
dc.subjectsandy loam soils
dc.subjectheifers
dc.subjectdiets
dc.subjectgrazing behavior
dc.subjectin vitro digestibility
dc.subjectbotanical composition
dc.subjectnutritive value
dc.subjectforage
dc.titleInfluence of range site on diet selection and nutrient intake of cattle
dc.typetext
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Range Management
dc.description.noteThis material was digitized as part of a cooperative project between the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries.
dc.description.collectioninformationThe Journal of Range Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.description.admin-noteMigrated from OJS platform August 2020
dc.source.volume43
dc.source.issue2
dc.source.beginpage109-116
refterms.dateFOA2020-09-24T02:32:17Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
8454-8335-2-PB.pdf
Size:
874.5Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record