• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Journals and Magazines
    • Society for Range Management Journal Archives
    • Rangeland Ecology & Management / Journal of Range Management
    • Journal of Range Management, Volume 41 (1988)
    • Journal of Range Management, Volume 41, Number 5 (September 1988)
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Journals and Magazines
    • Society for Range Management Journal Archives
    • Rangeland Ecology & Management / Journal of Range Management
    • Journal of Range Management, Volume 41 (1988)
    • Journal of Range Management, Volume 41, Number 5 (September 1988)
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of UA Campus RepositoryCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournalThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournal

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    About

    AboutUA Faculty PublicationsUA DissertationsUA Master's ThesesUA Honors ThesesUA PressUA YearbooksUA CatalogsUA Libraries

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Comparative chemical composition of armed saltbush and fourwing saltbush

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    8296-8177-2-PB.pdf
    Size:
    395.2Kb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Author
    Garza, A.
    Fulbright, T. E.
    Issue Date
    1988-09-01
    Keywords
    atriplex acanthocarpa
    Atriplex canescens
    Odocoileus virginianus
    species
    digestibility
    semiarid zones
    Texas
    rangelands
    livestock
    forage
    plant height
    chemical constituents of plants
    Show allShow less
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Citation
    Garza, A., & Fulbright, T. E. (1988). Comparative chemical composition of armed saltbush and fourwing saltbush. Journal of Range Management, 41(5), 401-403.
    Publisher
    Society for Range Management
    Journal
    Journal of Range Management
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10150/644986
    DOI
    10.2307/3899576
    Additional Links
    https://rangelands.org/
    Abstract
    Armed saltbush [Atriplex acanthocarpa (Torr.) Wats.] and fourwing saltbush [A. canescens (Pursh) Nutt.] are browsed by livestock and white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus Raf.). The objective of this study was to compare the chemical composition of these 2 shrubs growing together in south Texas. Leaves and stems from the outer 5 cm of current year's growth of each species were randomly collected from each of 5 stands in November 1985 and February, May, and August 1986. Samples were analyzed for crude protein (CP), calcium, potassium (K), magnesium (Mg), sodium (Na), phosphorus (P), and in vitro organic matter digestibility (IVOMD). Height and standing crop were also determined. Crude protein of armed saltbush leaves ranged from 32% in February to 19% in August. Fourwing saltbush leaf CP ranged from 24% in February to 12% in August. Armed saltbush leaves and stems generally had greater P concentrations than fourwing saltbush. Calcium, K, and Mg concentrations and leaf IVOMD of the 2 species were similar. Fourwing saltbush had lower Na concentrations and greater leaf standing crop than armed saltbush. Laboratory-determined values suggest that both species may provide nutritious browse for cattle and deer on saline rangeland.
    Type
    text
    Article
    Language
    en
    ISSN
    0022-409X
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.2307/3899576
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    Journal of Range Management, Volume 41, Number 5 (September 1988)

    entitlement

     
    The University of Arizona Libraries | 1510 E. University Blvd. | Tucson, AZ 85721-0055
    Tel 520-621-6442 | repository@u.library.arizona.edu
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2017  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.