Estimation of phytomass for ungrazed crested wheatgrass plants using allometric equations
Issue Date
1988-09-01Keywords
modelsbiomass determination
volume determination
estimates
allometry
nonlinear regression
Agropyron desertorum
prediction
productivity
diameter
range management
Utah
canopy
plant height
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Johnson, P. S., Johnson, C. L., & West, N. E. (1988). Estimation of phytomass for ungrazed crested wheatgrass plants using allometric equations. Journal of Range Management, 41(5), 421-425.Publisher
Society for Range ManagementJournal
Journal of Range ManagementDOI
10.2307/3899582Additional Links
https://rangelands.org/Abstract
The allometric relationship between plant volume and phytomass of crested wheatgrass was studied for the 1981, 1983, and 1984 growing seasons in west-central Utah. Basal diameters, canopy diameters, and standing plant heights were measured for individual plants. Three models of volume (basal elliptical cylinder, canopy elliptical cylinder, and elliptical cone section) were tested as predictors of plant phytomass using nonlinear regression. Elliptical cone section produced the highest R2 and lowest SEE, but requires measurement of canopy diameters which may be subject to excessive measurement error. Basal elliptical cylinder produced R2 and SEE values nearly comparable to those of the elliptical cone section; moreover, this model does not require measurement of canopy diameters, making it the practical choice. Nonlinear regressions for plants by size class (small, medium and large) were produced using 1983 data. Predictive ability of size class-specific equations was compared to that of the equation for all size classes combined. When phytomass of only small or medium size class plants was predicted, the SEE of size class-specific equations was slightly lower than the SEE of the equation for all size classes combined. When phytomass of plants from all size classes was predicted, however, the equation for all size classes combined produced the lowest combined SEE for new data (i.e., data not used to generate the equation). There were substantial year-to-year differences between equations, which indicates the necessity of producing new equations each year.Type
textArticle
Language
enISSN
0022-409Xae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.2307/3899582