Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGillen, R. L.
dc.contributor.authorRollins, D.
dc.contributor.authorStritzke, J. F.
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-24T03:15:53Z
dc.date.available2020-09-24T03:15:53Z
dc.date.issued1987-09-01
dc.identifier.citationGillen, R. L., Rollins, D., & Stritzke, J. F. (1987). Atrazine, spring burning, and nitrogen for improvement of tallgrass prairie. Journal of Range Management, 40(5), 444-447.
dc.identifier.issn0022-409X
dc.identifier.doi10.2307/3899608
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/645136
dc.description.abstractSpring application of atrazine [2-chloro-4-(ethylamino)-6-(isopropylamino)-s-triazine] (1.1 kg ha-1 a.i.), burning, and nitrogen (33 kg ha-1 as ammonium nitrate) were evaluated alone and in all combinations for improvement of mid-seral tallgrass prairie in northcentral Oklahoma. Studies were initiated in 1984 (Study I) and 1985 (Study II). Precipitation and successional status of the vegetation at treatment application were higher for Study II than for Study I. Atrazine effectively reduced forbs and annual grasses for 2 years after application. Atrazine stimulated warm-season perennial grasses but did not generally increase total herbage production. Burning was similar to atrazine for annual grass control in both studies. Burning was also similar to atrazine for forb control in Study I but had no impact on forb production in Study II. Burning increased perennial grass production only in the second year of Study I. Burning decreased total herbage production in the first year of Study I by reducing annual grasses and forbs but did not affect total herbage production on other dates. Nitrogen did not consistently increase perennial grass production but did increase forb production by 250-300% when applied alone. Both atrazine and burning rapidly shifted species composition in favor of desirable perennial grasses. Nitrogen was not as effective in changing species composition either alone or in combination with atrazine and burning. The number and complexity of treatment responses declined as successional status and/or precipitation improved.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSociety for Range Management
dc.relation.urlhttps://rangelands.org/
dc.rightsCopyright © Society for Range Management.
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectatrazine
dc.subjectgrassland improvement
dc.subjectfertilizer application
dc.subjectecological succession
dc.subjectnitrogen
dc.subjectprescribed burning
dc.subjectOklahoma
dc.subjectPoaceae
dc.subjectprairies
dc.subjectbotanical composition
dc.titleAtrazine, Spring Burning, and Nitrogen for Improvement of Tallgrass Prairie
dc.typetext
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Range Management
dc.description.noteThis material was digitized as part of a cooperative project between the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries.
dc.description.collectioninformationThe Journal of Range Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.description.admin-noteMigrated from OJS platform August 2020
dc.source.volume40
dc.source.issue5
dc.source.beginpage444-447
refterms.dateFOA2020-09-24T03:15:53Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
8173-8054-2-PB.pdf
Size:
616.4Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record