• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Journals and Magazines
    • Society for Range Management Journal Archives
    • Rangeland Ecology & Management / Journal of Range Management
    • Journal of Range Management, Volume 41 (1988)
    • Journal of Range Management, Volume 41, Number 4 (July 1988)
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Journals and Magazines
    • Society for Range Management Journal Archives
    • Rangeland Ecology & Management / Journal of Range Management
    • Journal of Range Management, Volume 41 (1988)
    • Journal of Range Management, Volume 41, Number 4 (July 1988)
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of UA Campus RepositoryCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournalThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournal

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    About

    AboutUA Faculty PublicationsUA DissertationsUA Master's ThesesUA Honors ThesesUA PressUA YearbooksUA CatalogsUA Libraries

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Cellulase vs rumen fluid for in vitro digestibility of mixed diets

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    8274-8155-2-PB.pdf
    Size:
    431.0Kb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Author
    Dickerson, R. L.
    Dahl, B.
    Scott, G.
    Issue Date
    1988-07-01
    Keywords
    feed mixing
    cellulases
    rumen fluids
    histology
    Poaceae
    diet studies
    cattle
    in vitro digestibility
    Texas
    rangelands
    forage
    Show allShow less
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Citation
    Dickerson, R. L., Dahl, B., & Scott, G. (1988). Cellulase vs rumen fluid for in vitro digestibility of mixed diets. Journal of Range Management, 41(4), 337-339.
    Publisher
    Society for Range Management
    Journal
    Journal of Range Management
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10150/645143
    DOI
    10.2307/3899392
    Additional Links
    https://rangelands.org/
    Abstract
    Nutritional studies frequently require an estimate of animal diet digestibility, but current in vitro techniques require costly fistulated animals, and variation in rumen fluid activity often results in poor precision. Hoping to find a more precise, yet cheaper, alternative, we examined estimates of organic matter digestibility of cattle diets based on a cellulase technique and compared them to those based on in vitro digestions. Diets were determined using microhistological analysis of native range forages, weeping lovegrass, and wheat pasture from May 1985 through May 1986. The 2 techniques offered estimates that were highly correlated (r = 0.91 to 0.94) when diets consisted of cool-season grasses and forbs. Digestibility estimates of diets by the 2 techniques for predominantly warm-season species on native range were less well correlated (r = 0.81 to 0.86). Agreement between the 2 techniques was relatively poor for mixed species diets from weeping lovegrass pastures (r = 0.48). We conclude that in vitro digestion using cellulase offers a promising approach for assessing diet quality, particularly with diets dominated by graminoids.
    Type
    text
    Article
    Language
    en
    ISSN
    0022-409X
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.2307/3899392
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    Journal of Range Management, Volume 41, Number 4 (July 1988)

    entitlement

     
    The University of Arizona Libraries | 1510 E. University Blvd. | Tucson, AZ 85721-0055
    Tel 520-621-6442 | repository@u.library.arizona.edu
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2017  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.