Issue Date
1987-09-01Keywords
hypothesis testingprobability analysis
frequency distribution
computer simulation
vegetation
sampling
botanical composition
rangelands
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Whysong, G. L., & Brady, W. W. (1987). Frequency sampling and Type II errors. Journal of Range Management, 40(5), 472-474.Publisher
Society for Range ManagementJournal
Journal of Range ManagementDOI
10.2307/3899614Additional Links
https://rangelands.org/Abstract
Probabilities of detecting frequency differences based on data obtained by random sampling were determined by computer simulation. Artificial, monotypic populations of known frequency were generated and sampled. Sample sizes of 100, 200, 500, and 1,000 plots were used to compare baseline populations of 20, 50, and 80% frequency to populations having progressively larger or smaller frequencies. Probabilities of detecting a difference in frequency from baseline populations were empirically estimated from 10,000 comparisons using a test of proportions (P<0.05). Results indicated that the power of the test was substantially reduced at lower sample sizes. Equating the probability of Type I and Type II errors at 0.05 resulted in sample sizes of approximately 500 plots being needed to statistically distinguish between differences of plus or minus 10% frequency.Type
textArticle
Language
enISSN
0022-409Xae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.2307/3899614