Responses of Fecal Coliform in Streamwater to Four Grazing Strategies
Issue Date
1987-07-01Keywords
Escherichia coliwater pollution
coliform bacteria
grant county, oregon
streams
watersheds
feces
Oregon
grazing intensity
cattle
water quality
grazing
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Tiedemann, A. R., Higgins, D. A., Quigle, Q. T., Sanderson, H. R., & Marx, D. B. (1987). Responses of fecal coliform in streamwater to four grazing strategies. Journal of Range Management, 40(4), 322-329.Publisher
Society for Range ManagementJournal
Journal of Range ManagementDOI
10.2307/3898729Additional Links
https://rangelands.org/Abstract
Concentrations and loadings (output, number day-1 km-2) of fecal coliform (FC) indicator bacteria were measured from 1979 through 1984 in streamflow from 13 forested watersheds under the following range management strategies: (A) no grazing; (B) grazing without management for livestock distribution; (C) grazing with management to obtain livestock distribution, and (D) grazing with management to obtain livestock distribution and cultural practices to increase forage. Both FC concentrations (number/100 ml) and instantaneous loadings differed significantly among strategies, seasons, and water years. Differences among strategies for mean concentrations were A<C=B<D. For instantaneous loadings, significant differences were A<C, B or D; and C<D. FC concentrations were the same for winter and for snowmelt runoff seasons but concentrations of both were significantly lower than during the summer period. Loadings were different for each season with winter<summer<snowmelt runoff. A definite relationship was established between the presence of cattle on the pastures and FC concentrations. Elevated FC counts in strategy D watersheds and loadings in excess of 10^4 organisms day-1 km-2 in the winter season provide evidence that organisms live into and through the winter period in animal feces, sediment, and soil. Results provide evidence that livestock removal may not provide an immediate solution to elevated levels of FC in streamwater.Type
textArticle
Language
enISSN
0022-409Xae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.2307/3898729
