Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPitts, J. S.
dc.contributor.authorBryant, F. C.
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-24T03:26:55Z
dc.date.available2020-09-24T03:26:55Z
dc.date.issued1987-09-01
dc.identifier.citationPitts, J. S., & Bryant, F. C. (1987). Steer and vegetation response to short duration and continuous grazing. Journal of Range Management, 40(6), 386-389.
dc.identifier.issn0022-409X
dc.identifier.doi10.2307/3899592
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/645245
dc.description.abstractComparisons were made over a 4-year period between 1-herd, 16-pasture short duration grazing (SDG) and continuous grazing (CG) on the Texas High Plains. Animal performance, vegetation response, and diet quality were evaluated. Stocking rate on SDG was equal to that on CG the first year (13.3 ha/AU), double that on CG in the second year, and 1.5 times that on CG the third and fourth years. Average daily gain (ADG) of steers was the same (0.33 kg/day) between SDG and CG the first year. When stocking was doubled on SDG the second year, steers on SDG gained 0.15 kg/day compared to 0.25 kg/day under CG. In the third and fourth years, with stocking under SDG at 1.5 times that on CG, gains were similar. Standing crop biomass on SDG fell below that on CG after 1 year of grazing. In the second year standing crop was greater (P<0.05) on SDG than on CG, but in years 3 and 4, standing crop on the SDG was less than on CG. Changes in species composition were the same on both CG and SDG. Steer diet composition and quality were evaluated during the growing season (May to October) of year 4. Steers on SDG consumed 15% more forbs (39% vs 24%) than steers on CG. No differences (P>0.05) between CG and SDG were observed for dietary crude protein or in vitro digestible organic matter. SDG did not improve animal performance, diet quality, or forage availability over CG when evaluated over 4 years.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSociety for Range Management
dc.relation.urlhttps://rangelands.org/
dc.rightsCopyright © Society for Range Management.
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectliveweight gain
dc.subjectgrazing experiments
dc.subjectstocking rate
dc.subjectsteers
dc.subjectTexas
dc.subjectbotanical composition
dc.subjectrangelands
dc.subjectgrazing
dc.subjectforage
dc.subjectfeeding preferences
dc.titleSteer and Vegetation Response to Short Duration and Continuous Grazing
dc.typetext
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Range Management
dc.description.noteThis material was digitized as part of a cooperative project between the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries.
dc.description.collectioninformationThe Journal of Range Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.description.admin-noteMigrated from OJS platform August 2020
dc.source.volume40
dc.source.issue5
dc.source.beginpage386-389
refterms.dateFOA2020-09-24T03:26:55Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
8157-8038-2-PB.pdf
Size:
582.0Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record