We are upgrading the repository! A content freeze is in effect until November 22nd, 2024 - no new submissions will be accepted; however, all content already published will remain publicly available. Please reach out to repository@u.library.arizona.edu with your questions, or if you are a UA affiliate who needs to make content available soon. Note that any new user accounts created after September 22, 2024 will need to be recreated by the user in November after our migration is completed.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJudkins, M. B.
dc.contributor.authorWallace, J. D.
dc.contributor.authorGalyean, M. L.
dc.contributor.authorKrysl, L. J.
dc.contributor.authorParker, E. E.
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-24T03:45:12Z
dc.date.available2020-09-24T03:45:12Z
dc.date.issued1987-03-01
dc.identifier.citationJudkins, M. B., Wallace, J. D., Galyean, M. L., Krysl, L. J., & Parker, E. E. (1987). Passage rates, rumen fermentation, and weight change in protein supplemented grazing cattle. Journal of Range Management, 40(2), 100-105.
dc.identifier.issn0022-409X
dc.identifier.doi10.2307/3899196
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/645374
dc.description.abstractProtein supplementation is widely used to enhance the nutritional status of cattle on rangeland. The effects of protein supplementation on particulate and fluid passage rates, rumen fermentation, and weight gain were evaluated on cattle grazing dormant blue grama rangeland. Twelve rumen-cannulated steers were randomly allotted to 3 equal supplement groups (4/treatment): cottonseed cake (CSC), pelleted alfalfa (ALF), or no supplement (CON). Supplements were individually fed every other day at isonitrogenous levels (1.7 kg/hd CSC vs 3.6 kg/hd ALF). Particulate passage rate was measured during 2 collection periods. Concurrently, 102 yearling heifers were allotted to the same treatment groups for measurement of average daily gain. Cattle were fed these treatments from January through April 1983. In a second trial, 9 rumen-cannulated steers were randomly allotted to the same treatment groups as trial 1. An intraruminal dose of Co-EDTA was used to estimate fluid passage rates. Rumen ammonia, volatile fatty acids, and pH were also measured. In trial 1, average daily gain did not differ between ALF and CSC supplemented heifers; however, both ALF and CSC gained more than CON heifers. Passage rate estimates were not different among treatment groups. In trial 2, rumen fluid dilution rate, volume, and outflow rate were not different among treatments. Rumen ammonia-N was different at 11 h postsupplementation when the CSC steers had higher levels than steers in other treatment groups. Rumen pH was not influenced by supplementation. Molar proportions of acetate and propionate at 8 and 11 h after supplementation differed among treatment groups. Acetate was lowest in ALF, intermediate in CSC, and highest in CON supplemented steers. Propionate followed the reverse trend. Overall, protein supplementation improved livestock performance but the mechanism involved was not elicited. The current data suggest shifts in fermentation patterns and meeting dietary demands for gain are the factors involved in improving performance.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSociety for Range Management
dc.relation.urlhttps://rangelands.org/
dc.rightsCopyright © Society for Range Management.
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectvolatile fatty acids
dc.subjectalfalfa pellets
dc.subjectalfalfa
dc.subjectalfalfa hay
dc.subjectammonium nitrogen
dc.subjectcottonseed meal
dc.subjectliveweight gain
dc.subjecthay
dc.subjectdietary supplements
dc.subjectpH
dc.subjecttransit time
dc.subjectprotein supplements
dc.subjectrumen fermentation
dc.subjectrangelands
dc.subjectgrazing
dc.subjectNew Mexico
dc.subjectbeef cattle
dc.titlePassage Rates, Rumen Fermentation, and Weight Change in Protein Supplemented Grazing Cattle
dc.typetext
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Range Management
dc.description.noteThis material was digitized as part of a cooperative project between the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries.
dc.description.collectioninformationThe Journal of Range Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.description.admin-noteMigrated from OJS platform August 2020
dc.source.volume40
dc.source.issue2
dc.source.beginpage100-105
refterms.dateFOA2020-09-24T03:45:12Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
8087-7968-2-PB.pdf
Size:
800.5Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record