Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEckert, R. E.
dc.contributor.authorPeterson, F. F.
dc.contributor.authorBelton, J. T.
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-24T03:45:58Z
dc.date.available2020-09-24T03:45:58Z
dc.date.issued1986-09-01
dc.identifier.citationEckert, R. E., Peterson, F. F., & Belton, J. T. (1986). Relation between ecological-range condition and proportion of soil-surface types. Journal of Range Management, 39(5), 409-414.
dc.identifier.issn0022-409X
dc.identifier.doi10.2307/3899440
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/645385
dc.description.abstractDifferent kinds of A-horizon soil-surface types occur on loessmantled xerollic Orthids and Argids in the Intermountain area. Four soil-surface types were identified on sites with potential vegetation of Wyoming big sagebrush [Artemisia tridentata wyomingensis Beetle] and Thurber needlegrass [Stipa thurberiana Piper]. These surfaces occupy different microtopographic positions and have different morphologies and chemical and physical properties. This study relates differences in the cover of these soil-surface types to ecological-range condition on sites of similar potential. Proportion of the surface type found under shrub or bunchgrass cover varies with range condition. More of the surface associated with shrub cover is found on low condition sites because of greater sagebrush cover. More of the surface associated with bunchgrass cover is found on high condition sites because of greater grass cover. Proportion of the surface types found in the interspace between shrubs also varies with range condition. High condition sites have a greater cover of the soil surface associated with bunchgrass cover and of the soil surface with cryptogam-stabilized microrelief. Conversely, low condition sites have essentially none of the soil surface associated with bunchgrass cover but a large amount of the soil surface with little microrelief. Results are interpreted in terms of watershed stability and natural revegetation potential.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSociety for Range Management
dc.relation.urlhttps://rangelands.org/
dc.rightsCopyright © Society for Range Management.
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjecthumboldt loess belt
dc.subjectecological zones
dc.subjectgreat basin and pacific slope
dc.subjectsurface area of soil materials
dc.subjectA horizons
dc.subjectrangeland soils
dc.subjectsoil morphological features
dc.subjectAchnatherum thurberianum
dc.subjectwatersheds
dc.subjectsoil types
dc.subjectArtemisia tridentata
dc.subjectland restoration
dc.titleRelation Between Ecological-Range Condition and Proportion of Soil-Surface Types
dc.typetext
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Range Management
dc.description.noteThis material was digitized as part of a cooperative project between the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries.
dc.description.collectioninformationThe Journal of Range Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.description.admin-noteMigrated from OJS platform August 2020
dc.source.volume39
dc.source.issue5
dc.source.beginpage409-414
refterms.dateFOA2020-09-24T03:45:58Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
8029-7910-2-PB.pdf
Size:
1.848Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record