Comparison of the Reference Unit Method and Dimensional Analysis Methods for Two Large Shrubby Species in the Caatinga Woodlands
Issue Date
1985-09-01Keywords
foliage areadimensional analysis
biomass determination
woodland grasslands
Mimosa
auxemma oncocalyx
mimosa acutistipula
woody plants
semiarid zones
Brazil
range management
canopy
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Kirmse, R. D., & Norton, B. E. (1985). Comparison of the reference unit method and dimensional analysis methods for two large shrubby species in the Caatinga woodlands. Journal of Range Management, 38(5), 425-428.Publisher
Society for Range ManagementJournal
Journal of Range ManagementDOI
10.2307/3899714Additional Links
https://rangelands.org/Abstract
The reference unit technique was compared with the dimensional analysis approach for estimating large shrub foliage biomass in Northeast Brazil. The techniques were tested on coppicing jurema (Mimosa acutistipula Benth.) and pau branco (Auxemma oncocalyx [Fr. Alem.] Taub.). Both methods provided good estimates of foliage weight. The coefficients of determination for the reference unit approach ranged from .890 to .985. The r2 values obtained in applying the dimensional analysis method were .937 and .948. Improvements in estimates with the reference unit method were obtained when (1) a branch unit of 19% of total plant foliage was used versus a unit of only 7%, (2) the branch unit resembled the appearance of the branching of the plant being estimated, and (3) estimations of 3 judges were averaged.Type
textArticle
Language
enISSN
0022-409Xae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.2307/3899714