Forage Response of a Mesquite-Buffalograss Community Following Range Rehabilitation
Issue Date
1984-11-01Keywords
Forage ResponseClay Loam
Mechanical Grubbing
Vibratilling
Soil Cover
Kleingrass
Post-Mahogany Estate Ranch
Climatological Data
Shredding
foliar application
plant litter
honey mesquite
standing crop
rehabilitation
Community
buffalo grass
grazing capacity
grass production
2,4,5-T
Prosopis glandulosa
picloram
range
herbage production
mesquite
control
Texas
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Bedunah, D. J., & Sosebee, R. E. (1984). Forage response of a mesquite-buffalograss community following range rehabilitation. Journal of Range Management, 37(6), 483-487.Publisher
Society for Range ManagementJournal
Journal of Range ManagementDOI
10.2307/3898840Additional Links
https://rangelands.org/Abstract
The influence of different range rehabilitation methods on honey mesquite control, herbage production, and grazing capacity were evaluated on a depleted clay loam range site in west Texas. Mesquite control by foliar application of 2,4,5-T + picloram, shredding, mechanical grubbing, mechanical grubbing and seeding to kleingrass, and mechanical grubbing and vibratilling increased herbage production and grazing capacity. Shredding increased soil cover by adding plant litter, but significantly controlled mesquite competition for only 2 years. Seeding to kleingrass resulted in a productive stand with a high estimated grazing capacity. Foliar spraying doubled grass production compared to no treatment and resulted in 76% mesquite mortality 3 years after treatment. Deferment from grazing was important in increasing herbage production during the study period; however, for maximum grazing capacity both mesquite control and proper grazing would be necessary.Type
textArticle
Language
enISSN
0022-409Xae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.2307/3898840