We are upgrading the repository! A content freeze is in effect until November 22nd, 2024 - no new submissions will be accepted; however, all content already published will remain publicly available. Please reach out to repository@u.library.arizona.edu with your questions, or if you are a UA affiliate who needs to make content available soon. Note that any new user accounts created after September 22, 2024 will need to be recreated by the user in November after our migration is completed.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLacey, J. R.
dc.contributor.authorWight, J.
dc.contributor.authorWorkman, J. P.
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-24T04:20:25Z
dc.date.available2020-09-24T04:20:25Z
dc.date.issued1985-01-01
dc.identifier.citationLacey, J. R., Wight, J. R., & Workman, J. P. (1985). Investment rationale for range improvement practices in Eastern Montana. Journal of Range Management, 38(1), 2-6.
dc.identifier.issn0022-409X
dc.identifier.doi10.2307/3899321
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/645672
dc.description.abstractEvidence suggests that the range livestock industry in the Northern Great Plains is not as productive as it should be. Ranchers are not readily adopting the range improvement practices that researchers recommend. Therefore, an economic survey of eastern Montana ranchers was conducted to evaluate the current status of range improvement practices. Specific objectives were to determine: (1) if range improvement investments were influenced by ranch size; (2) the kinds of range improvements that were being implemented; (3) the areas where additional research was needed in range improvements; and (4) if stocking rates were influenced by ranch size. It was determined that a majority of the ranchers had purchased equipment and invested in additional water developments, fencing, and other structural improvements during the previous five-year period. A much smaller percentage had invested in seeded pastures, contour furrows, fertilizer, and other nonstructural improvements. Although small ranches had more range improvements developed per unit area, large ranches (401 animal units or more) were investing in range improvements more frequently than smaller ranches. Questionnaires returned from 568 ranchers indicated that research on range improvement practices should emphasize range seeding. Stocking rate on rangeland was not influenced by ranch size.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSociety for Range Management
dc.relation.urlhttps://rangelands.org/
dc.rightsCopyright © Society for Range Management.
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectinvestment
dc.subjectgrassland improvement
dc.subjectranching
dc.subjectstocking rate
dc.subjectMontana
dc.subjectrangelands
dc.titleInvestment Rationale for Range Improvement Practices in Eastern Montana
dc.typetext
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Range Management
dc.description.noteThis material was digitized as part of a cooperative project between the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries.
dc.description.collectioninformationThe Journal of Range Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.description.admin-noteMigrated from OJS platform August 2020
dc.source.volume38
dc.source.issue1
dc.source.beginpage2-6
refterms.dateFOA2020-09-24T04:20:25Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
7790-7671-1-PB.pdf
Size:
702.8Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record