A Comparison of Three Methods for Estimating Forage Disappearance
Issue Date
1983-07-01Keywords
livestockrange and pasture studies
perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne)
subclover (Trifolium subterraneum)
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Sharrow, S. H., & Motazedian, I. (1983). A comparison of three methods for estimating forage disappearance. Journal of Range Management, 36(4), 469-471.Publisher
Society for Range ManagementJournal
Journal of Range ManagementDOI
10.2307/3897942Additional Links
https://rangelands.org/Abstract
Three methods of calculating forage disappearance from forage standing crop present on mowed versus protected plots were compared to the actual amount of forage harvested from mowed plots. The method most widely used by range scientists, the difference method, displayed a marked tendency to overestimate forage disappearance during periods of rapid plant growth or when plots were protected for more than 3 weeks. More accurate estimates of forage disappearance were generally obtained using formulae suggested by Linehan et al. (1947) and Bosch (1956) than could be obtained by the difference method.Type
textArticle
Language
enISSN
0022-409Xae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.2307/3897942
