Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHolechek, J. L.
dc.contributor.authorVavra, M.
dc.contributor.authorSkovlin, J.
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-25T07:16:09Z
dc.date.available2020-09-25T07:16:09Z
dc.date.issued1982-11-01
dc.identifier.citationHolechek, J. L., Vavra, M., & Skovlin, J. (1982). Cattle diet and daily gains on a mountain riparian meadow in northeastern Oregon. Journal of Range Management, 35(6), 745-747.
dc.identifier.issn0022-409X
dc.identifier.doi10.2307/3898254
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/645974
dc.description.abstractCattle weight gains, diet botanical composition, and diet quality on a riparian meadow range in the Blue Mountains of eastern Oregon were evaluated in the late summer and fall in 1976, 1977, and 1978. Pregnant yearling heifers were used to evaluate livestock performance. Esophageally fistulated cows were used to evaluate diet botanical composition and diet quality. Cattle diets showed little difference in botanical composition between periods or years. Grasses comprised an average of 80% of the diet during the 3 year period. Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis) was the most important grass in cattle diets and had the highest percent cover on the study pastures. Cattle diet quality showed little change within or between years. Crude protein concentrations appeared adequate for cattle to gain .5 kg per day. However, estimated digestible energy concentrations averaged only 80% of that recommended by the NRC. Daily gains were erratic between and within years averaging .41 kg for the 3 years. Average daily gains on the meadow were better than or equal to those reported in other studies for upland and upland and meadow pastures at the Starkey Range for the same periods. Separate fencing and deferred grazing of mountain meadows could improve cattle performance and aid ranchers in gathering cattle at the end of the grazing season. In addition deferred grazing should result in pasture improvement and provide better habitat for nesting birds. The primary disadvantage of deferred use of meadows would be the cost of fencing.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSociety for Range Management
dc.relation.urlhttps://rangelands.org/
dc.rightsCopyright © Society for Range Management.
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectPasture Improvement
dc.subjectStarkey Experimental Range
dc.subjectcattle diets
dc.subjectMountain Riparian Meadow
dc.subjectdiet botanical composition
dc.subjectPregnant Heifers
dc.subjectStarkey Range
dc.subjectdaily gains
dc.subjectBlue Mountains
dc.subjectweight gain
dc.subjectdiet quality
dc.subjectdeferred grazing
dc.subjectKentucky bluegrass
dc.subjectPoa pratensis
dc.subjectcrude protein
dc.subjectfencing
dc.subjectcomposition
dc.subjectOregon
dc.titleCattle Diet and Daily Gains on a Mountain Riparian Meadow in Northeastern Oregon
dc.typetext
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Range Management
dc.description.noteThis material was digitized as part of a cooperative project between the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries.
dc.description.collectioninformationThe Journal of Range Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.description.admin-noteMigrated from OJS platform August 2020
dc.source.volume35
dc.source.issue6
dc.source.beginpage745-747
refterms.dateFOA2020-09-25T07:16:09Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
7434-7315-1-PB.pdf
Size:
416.3Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record