Evaluation of Different Calculation Procedures for Microhistological Analysis
Issue Date
1982-11-01Keywords
Calculation Proceduresmicrohistological analysis
Forage Mixtures
weight composition
dry weight
evaluation
density
frequency
New Mexico
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Holechek, J. L., & Gross, B. D. (1982). Evaluation of different calculation procedures for microhistological analysis. Journal of Range Management, 35(6), 721-723.Publisher
Society for Range ManagementJournal
Journal of Range ManagementDOI
10.2307/3898248Additional Links
https://rangelands.org/Abstract
This study evaluated 3 procedures for calculating dry weight composition of forage mixtures when microhistological analysis was used. Dividing the frequency of each species by the total frequencies of all species gave a slightly more accurate representation of dry weight composition than converting frequency to relative density or using actual density. The frequency addition procedure is much quicker than either procedure involving density.Type
textArticle
Language
enISSN
0022-409Xae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.2307/3898248