Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNichols, P. J.
dc.contributor.authorMcGinnies, W. J.
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-26T05:12:32Z
dc.date.available2020-09-26T05:12:32Z
dc.date.issued1982-05-01
dc.identifier.citationNichols, P. J., & McGinnies, W. J. (1982). An evaluation of 17 grasses and 2 legumes for revegetation of soil and spoil on a coal strip mine. Journal of Range Management, 35(3), 288-293.
dc.identifier.issn0022-409X
dc.identifier.doi10.2307/3898303
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/646132
dc.description.abstractSeventeen grass species and two legumes were evaluated in a greenhouse study to determine their potential for revegetation of coal strip mine areas. Each species was grown in 25 cm of topsoil placed over 28 cm of mine-spoil or in 53 cm of spoil without topsoil. Herbage yields were seven times greater and root yields six times greater when the grasses were grown in topsoil than when grown in spoil without topsoil. When herbage production, root production, and crude protein were considered together and given equal weight, the five species with the highest combined ratings when grown in 25 cm of topsoil over spoil were tall fescue, hard fescue, Russian wildrye, western wheatgrass, and Arizona fescue. All grass species studied produced relatively low yields when grown in spoil without topsoil. Average herbage yields for the native and introduced grass species studied were similar, but introduced species averaged greater root production, particularly in spoil material. Two legumes, alfalfa and cicer milkvetch, produced much higher yields and higher crude protein than any of the grasses studied whether grown in topsoil over spoil or in spoil without topsoil.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSociety for Range Management
dc.relation.urlhttps://rangelands.org/
dc.rightsCopyright © Society for Range Management.
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectreclamation
dc.titleAn Evaluation of 17 Grasses and 2 Legumes for Revegetation of Soil and Spoil on a Coal Strip Mine
dc.typetext
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Range Management
dc.description.noteThis material was digitized as part of a cooperative project between the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries.
dc.description.collectioninformationThe Journal of Range Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.description.admin-noteMigrated from OJS platform August 2020
dc.source.volume35
dc.source.issue3
dc.source.beginpage288-293
refterms.dateFOA2020-09-26T05:12:32Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
7326-7207-1-PB.pdf
Size:
1.629Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record