Flood-fragility analysis of instream bridges – consideration of flow hydraulics, geotechnical uncertainties, and variable scour depth
Affiliation
Univ Arizona, Dept Civil & Architectural Engn & MechIssue Date
2020-09-08Keywords
Fragility analysisflood vulnerability
river hydraulics
geotechnical uncertainties
fragility surface
first-order reliability method
bridge scour
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Informa UK LimitedCitation
Ahamed, T., Duan, J. G., & Jo, H. (2020). Flood-fragility analysis of instream bridges–consideration of flow hydraulics, geotechnical uncertainties, and variable scour depth. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 1-14.Rights
Copyright © 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Floods, bridge scour, and flood-associated loads have caused over sixty percent of bridge failures in the U.S. Current practices for the vulnerability assessment of instream bridges under the effect of such flood largely rely on qualitative methods, such as visual inspection, without considering uncertainties associated with structural behaviors and flood loads. Recently, numerical methods have been investigated to quantitatively consider such uncertainty effects by adapting fragility analysis concept that has been well established in the earthquake engineering area. However, river hydraulics, geotechnical uncertainties of foundation, variable scour-depth effects, and their significance in structural fragility of bridges have rarely been systematically investigated. This study proposes a comprehensive fragility analysis framework that can effectively incorporate both flow hydraulics and geotechnical uncertainties, in addition to commonly considered components in flood-fragility analysis of bridges. The significance of flow hydraulics and geotechnical uncertainties has been demonstrated through a real-bridge case study. Conventional fragility curves with maximum scour depth may not represent actual vulnerability during floods, as the scour may not reach to the maximum in many cases. Therefore, fragility surface with two intensity measures, i.e. flow discharges and scour depths, is introduced for real-time vulnerability assessment during floods in this study.Note
12 month embargo; published online: 08 September 2020ISSN
1573-2479EISSN
1744-8980Version
Final accepted manuscriptSponsors
National Science Foundation of Sri Lankaae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1080/15732479.2020.1815226
