Comparison of Cage Methods for Determining Utilization on Pine-Bluestem Range
Author
Grelen, H. E.Issue Date
1967-03-01Keywords
Forage ConsumptionCage Methods
Caged Quadrats
Measurement Technique
Pine
Longleaf Pine
Palustris Experimental Forest
comparison
Bluestem Range
herbage weight
burning
clipping
herbage
yield
utilization
Pinus palustris
growth
Louisiana
stocking rate
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Grelen, H. E. (1967). Comparison of cage methods for determining utilization on pine-bluestem range. Journal of Range Management, 20(2), 94-96.Publisher
Society for Range ManagementJournal
Journal of Range ManagementDOI
10.2307/3895953Additional Links
https://rangelands.org/Abstract
Plucking herbage from caged quadrats to simulate grazing resulted in lower estimates of yield and utilization than did monthly or yearly clipping of herbage from caged and open quadrats. At the end of the grazing season, estimates of ungrazed herbage did not differ significantly by measurement technique. The overestimate of yield when herbage was clipped once a year was probably caused by greater growth on caged than on open quadrats.Type
textArticle
Language
enISSN
0022-409Xae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.2307/3895953