Forage Analysis as Influenced by Sampling Position and Processing
Citation
Beaty, E. R., Miller, W. J., & Brooks, O. L. (1967). Forage analysis as influenced by sampling position and processing. Journal of Range Management, 20(4), 256-259.Publisher
Society for Range ManagementJournal
Journal of Range ManagementDOI
10.2307/3896264Additional Links
https://rangelands.org/Abstract
Collecting a representative sample of conserved forage is necessary if such practices as forage testing are to be meaningful. When uniform samples of Coastal bermudagrass and alfalfa were systematically sampled in nine different ways, the coefficient of variation for crude fiber and protein averaged approximately 5%. Sampling procedures satisfactory for one species may well be unsatisfactory for another.Type
textArticle
Language
enISSN
0022-409Xae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.2307/3896264
