Influence of Number and Spacing of Points on Accuracy and Precision of Basal Cover Estimates
Issue Date
1966-07-01Keywords
accuracySpacing
bunchgrasses
sampling
basal cover
populations
numbers
statistical analysis
artificial populations
precision
interactions
Foothill Bunchgrass Range
Point Densities
Point Placement
Seed Forming Species
Point Procedures
line Intercept
Theoretical Aspects
Point Data
Field Measurements
Intercept Transects
Percent Frequency
occurrence
Sod Forming Species
Random Placement
Systematic Placement
Dominant Bunchgrasses
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Fisser, H. G., & Van Dyne, G. M. (1966). Influence of number and spacing of points on accuracy and precision of basal cover estimates. Journal of Range Management, 19(4), 205-211.Publisher
Society for Range ManagementJournal
Journal of Range ManagementDOI
10.2307/3895648Additional Links
https://rangelands.org/Abstract
Records from 350 line intercept transects from a foothill bunchgrass range were sampled systematically and at random with 25, 50, and 100 points per line. Statistical analyses were made to compare point densities, point placement, and their interactions for 12 plant categories. Sod-forming species were sampled best by random placement, bunch-grasses by systematic placement, and for plant groups with high basal cover either placement would suffice.Type
textArticle
Language
enISSN
0022-409Xae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.2307/3895648