Mechanical Control and Fertilization as Brush Management Practices Affect Forage Production in South Texas
Issue Date
1967-07-01Keywords
Successional StageShrub Reinvasion
Follow Up Practices
Shredder
Roller Chop
K-G Blade
brush management
Root Plow
Rake
soil disturbance
Welder Wildlife Refuge
fluctuations
mechanical control
south Texas
fertilizer
forage production
Maintenance
range condition
fertilization
species composition
mowing
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Powell, J., & Box, T. W. (1967). Mechanical control and fertilization as brush management practices affect forage production in South Texas. Journal of Range Management, 20(4), 227-236.Publisher
Society for Range ManagementJournal
Journal of Range ManagementDOI
10.2307/3896257Additional Links
https://rangelands.org/Abstract
Brush control methods involving a minimum of soil disturbance were the most reliable methods of improving successional stage and increasing forage production. Soil disturbance retarded plant succession and caused a large fluctuation in yearly forage production. Nitrogen fertilizer increased forage production, but adversely affected species composition unless applied in conjunction with mowing. Mowing, as a follow-up maintenance practice, improved range condition, increased forage production on all brush control plots, and greatly increased the beneficial effects of all fertilizer treatments.Type
textArticle
Language
enISSN
0022-409Xae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.2307/3896257
