More than a decade in the making: A study of the implementation of India's Right to Information Act
Name:
Relly_et al_2020_A decade in the ...
Size:
802.3Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Accepted Manuscript
Affiliation
Univ Arizona, Sch JournalismIssue Date
2020-12Keywords
IndiaRight to Information Act
Freedom of Information laws
Implementation
Institutional development
Government transparency
Bureaucratic culture
Development
Corruption
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTDCitation
Relly, J. E., Rabbi, M. F., Sabharwal, M., Pakanati, R., & Schwalbe, E. H. (2020). More than a decade in the making: A study of the implementation of India's Right to Information Act. World Development, 136, 105088.Journal
WORLD DEVELOPMENTRights
Copyright © 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
India's progressive Right to Information Act (RTIA) is a global model. The RTIA was adopted a decade and a half ago to serve as a check on corruption and to advance democracy, citizen equity and public accountability. Little primary research has been conducted on the implementation of the RTIA. This research employs a socio-political and technocratic framework to study influences on RTIA implementation over time from the citizen requester 'demand-side' and the governmental 'supply-side' from an institutional development process perspective. Our constructivist approach utilizes in-depth semi-structured interviews from frequent information requesters and information commissioners (N = 114) and a new dataset of a random stratified sample of information commissioner decisions for release of information under the RTIA (N = 500). We found that political will, bureaucratic culture, and societal activism and engagement were the strongest overarching socio-political factors impacting implementation. Socio-political subfactors that appeared weak or wanting in the RTI regime were leadership, oversight, coordination, positive workplace incentives, reflexivity, and public information officer communication style with citizen requesters. Technocratic constraints, directly influenced by socio-political factors that impact implementation, included follow-through on administrative policies and rules, capacity building, monitoring, oversight, and sanctions. This study found that technocratic factors included in the institutional design of RTI legislation may not be sufficient for short-term institutional change in cultures of bureaucratic secrecy. However, coalitions of citizens, civil society organizations, media, engaged public officials, and interested politicians can drive a transparency agenda in a country when political will and bureaucratic leadership are weak. (C) 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd.Note
24 month embargo; available online 4 August 2020ISSN
0305-750XVersion
Final accepted manuscriptae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105088