Author
Graham, C. A.Issue Date
1953-07-01Keywords
Spray DistributionHerbicidal Spraying
Spray Coverage
Control Measures
Spraying Equipment
droplet size
Spray Patterns
droplet size
Droplet Density
Sensitized Paper
Tannic Acid
evaluate
Ester
Oil
carriers
Results
salt
herbicides
water
chemicals
2,4-D
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Graham, C. A. (1953). A practical way to evaluate spray distribution. Journal of Range Management, 6(4), 255-259.Publisher
Society for Range ManagementJournal
Journal of Range ManagementDOI
10.2307/3894507Additional Links
https://rangelands.org/Type
textArticle
Language
enISSN
0022-409Xae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.2307/3894507
Scopus Count
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Experiences with 2,4-D Spraying on the Lassen National ForestHormay, A. L.; Alberico, F. J.; Lord, P. B. (Society for Range Management, 1962-11-01)
-
Operating Field Dusters in ArizonaWelchert, W. T.; Roney, J. N.; Shields, I. J. (College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ), 1958-04)
-
Vegetation Response to An Ozark Woodland SprayingHalls, L. K.; Crawford, H. S. (Society for Range Management, 1965-11-01)Aerial spraying of an Ozark woodland with 2,4,5-T temporarily increased yields of grasses preferred by cattle. Reinvasion of woody plants and heavy grazing by cattle contributed to a subsequent decline in yields of grass. The invading shrubs included many species preferred by deer.