Author
Graham, C. A.Issue Date
1953-07-01Keywords
Spray DistributionHerbicidal Spraying
Spray Coverage
Control Measures
Spraying Equipment
droplet size
Spray Patterns
droplet size
Droplet Density
Sensitized Paper
Tannic Acid
evaluate
Ester
Oil
carriers
Results
salt
herbicides
water
chemicals
2,4-D
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Graham, C. A. (1953). A practical way to evaluate spray distribution. Journal of Range Management, 6(4), 255-259.Publisher
Society for Range ManagementJournal
Journal of Range ManagementDOI
10.2307/3894507Additional Links
https://rangelands.org/Type
textArticle
Language
enISSN
0022-409Xae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.2307/3894507
Scopus Count
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Experiences with 2,4-D Spraying on the Lassen National ForestHormay, A. L.; Alberico, F. J.; Lord, P. B. (Society for Range Management, 1962-11-01)
-
Operating Field Dusters in ArizonaWelchert, W. T.; Roney, J. N.; Shields, I. J. (College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ), 1958-04)
-
Soil Moisture Response to Spraying Big Sagebrush the Year of TreatmentSturges, D. L. (Society for Range Management, 1973-11-01)Spraying big sagebrush with 2,4-D in Wyoming reduced soil moisture loss 24% between June 24, the treatment date, and September 30. All of the reduction accrued by August 4, during the time of active vegetative growth. Moisture was measured to a 6-ft depth and 83% of the reduction was located in soil 2 to 6 ft deep.