Competition Between Big Sagebrush and Seeded Grasses on Foothill Ranges in Utah
Issue Date
1963-09-01Keywords
grass productionbrush invasion
root distribution
foothill range
intermediate wheatgrass
leaves
Reinvasion
Kill
Grass Vigor
root developmentGrass ResponseherbicidesSeeded Grassescompetitionheightsoil moisturebig sagebrush2,4-DArtemisia tridentataUtahcrested wheatgrass
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Cook, C. W. (1963). Competition between big sagebrush and seeded grasses on foothill ranges in Utah. Journal of Range Management, 16(5), 245-250.Publisher
Society for Range ManagementJournal
Journal of Range ManagementDOI
10.2307/3895334Additional Links
https://rangelands.org/Type
Articletext
Language
enISSN
0022-409XScopus Count
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Grass response to seasonal burns in experimental plantingsA 6-year experiment examined the effects of spring and summer fires on grasses in southern Wisconsin. Synthetic communities of C3 and C4 grasses were seeded (100 seeds m-2 species-1) in 1992 and subjected to prescribed burns in May and August of 1995 and 1997, or left unburned. By 1994 all plots were virtual monocultures of the C3 reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea L.). By the second post-season sample in 1998, total productivity of plots burned in May was higher (781 +/- 212 se g m-2 year-1) than those burned in August (362 +/- 28 g m-2 year-1) or left unburned (262 +/- 43 g m-2 year-1) due to the incursions of either the C4 grasses big bluestem (Andropogon gerardii Vitman), switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L), or both. These large late-season grasses are much more productive per area covered than P. arundinacea or the other two C3 grasses present, Elymus virginicus L. and Poa pratensis L. Even at this early stage of succession, C4 production in plots burned in May was 5 to 6 times that in the other 2 treatments. August burns produced a mix of C3 and C4 grasses but did not strongly favor the pre-treatment C3 dominant P. arundinacea. Unburned plots most resembled those burned in August in species composition, but differed in having 4 times the accumulated litter, perhaps foretelling divergence in C3 and C4 composition as succession proceeds.
-
Research observation: Influence of over-wintering feed regimen on consumption of locoweed by steersMany producers believe cattle grazing wheat pasture during the winter are likely to graze actively growing locoweed when turned onto short-grass prairie in the spring. White locoweed (Oxytropis sericea Nutt, ex T&G) consumption was compared in a spring grazing study between steers wintered on irrigated 'TAM 105' wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) pasture (Wheat) and steers wintered on native range (Range). Range steers consumed locoweed for 43% of bites compared to 17% for the Wheat steers, and began eating locoweed before steers in the Wheat group. We rejected the hypothesis that steers wintered on wheat are more inclined to graze locoweed than steers wintered on native range.
