Responses of Native and Introduced Grasses Following Aerial Spraying of Velvet Mesquite In Southern Arizona
Issue Date
1961-05-01Keywords
Tucsondefoliation
introduced grasses
aerial spraying
Southern Arizona
velvet mesquite
velutina
Lehmann lovegrass
Santa Rita Experimental Range
Prosopis juliflora
cost
native grasses
grass production
2,4,5-T
herbage production
mortality
control
perennial grass
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Cable, D. R., & Tschirley, F. H. (1961). Responses of native and introduced grasses following aerial spraying of velvet mesquite in southern Arizona. Journal of Range Management, 14(3), 155-159.Publisher
Society for Range ManagementJournal
Journal of Range ManagementDOI
10.2307/3895191Additional Links
https://rangelands.org/Type
Articletext
Language
enISSN
0022-409Xae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.2307/3895191
Scopus Count
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Grass response to seasonal burns in experimental plantingsHowe, H. F. (Society for Range Management, 2000-07-01)A 6-year experiment examined the effects of spring and summer fires on grasses in southern Wisconsin. Synthetic communities of C3 and C4 grasses were seeded (100 seeds m-2 species-1) in 1992 and subjected to prescribed burns in May and August of 1995 and 1997, or left unburned. By 1994 all plots were virtual monocultures of the C3 reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea L.). By the second post-season sample in 1998, total productivity of plots burned in May was higher (781 +/- 212 se g m-2 year-1) than those burned in August (362 +/- 28 g m-2 year-1) or left unburned (262 +/- 43 g m-2 year-1) due to the incursions of either the C4 grasses big bluestem (Andropogon gerardii Vitman), switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L), or both. These large late-season grasses are much more productive per area covered than P. arundinacea or the other two C3 grasses present, Elymus virginicus L. and Poa pratensis L. Even at this early stage of succession, C4 production in plots burned in May was 5 to 6 times that in the other 2 treatments. August burns produced a mix of C3 and C4 grasses but did not strongly favor the pre-treatment C3 dominant P. arundinacea. Unburned plots most resembled those burned in August in species composition, but differed in having 4 times the accumulated litter, perhaps foretelling divergence in C3 and C4 composition as succession proceeds.
-
Competition Between Big Sagebrush and Seeded Grasses on Foothill Ranges in UtahCook, C. W. (Society for Range Management, 1963-09-01)
-
Research observation: Influence of over-wintering feed regimen on consumption of locoweed by steersRalphs, M. H.; Graham, D.; Galyean, M. L.; James, L. F. (Society for Range Management, 1997-05-01)Many producers believe cattle grazing wheat pasture during the winter are likely to graze actively growing locoweed when turned onto short-grass prairie in the spring. White locoweed (Oxytropis sericea Nutt, ex T&G) consumption was compared in a spring grazing study between steers wintered on irrigated 'TAM 105' wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) pasture (Wheat) and steers wintered on native range (Range). Range steers consumed locoweed for 43% of bites compared to 17% for the Wheat steers, and began eating locoweed before steers in the Wheat group. We rejected the hypothesis that steers wintered on wheat are more inclined to graze locoweed than steers wintered on native range.