A Field Test of the Relative-Weight-Estimate Method for Determining Herbage Production
Issue Date
1969-11-01Keywords
field testsRelative Weight Estimate
Training Periods
Observers
Bias
Mental Image
Light Conditions
Observer Fatigue
attitudes
Montana Power Park
Vigilante
Modesty Creek
Field Estimates
Vegetation Classes
estimates
herbage production
accuracy
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Hutchings, S. S., & Schmautz, J. E. (1969). A field test of the relative-weight-estimate method for determining herbage production. Journal of Range Management, 22(6), 408-411.Publisher
Society for Range ManagementJournal
Journal of Range ManagementDOI
10.2307/3895852Additional Links
https://rangelands.org/Abstract
Reliable estimates of total herbage yield can be made by the relative-weight-estimate method. The method is based on the concept that it is easier and more accurate to estimate herbage yield as a percent of yield from a base plot than it is to estimate yields directly in grams or pounds. Estimates of total herbage are reasonably accurate, but they are less accurate for vegetation classes of grasses, forbs, and shrubs and for individual species. This method generally contains an inherent bias that cannot be detected unless a double-sampling procedure is used to check and correct field estimates.Type
Articletext
Language
enISSN
0022-409Xae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.2307/3895852
