Author
Smith, D. R.Issue Date
1969-07-01Keywords
Subalpine RangesModerate Utilization
Soldier Creek
Antelope Butte
Big Horn Mountains
Idaho fescue
revegetation
season-long grazing
Reinvasion
Artemisia
yield
herbage production
chemical control
vigor
sagebrush
grazing
2,4-D
deferment
Wyoming
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Smith, D. R. (1969). Is Deferment Always Needed after Chemical Control of Sagebrush?. Journal of Range Management, 22(4), 261-263.Publisher
Society for Range ManagementJournal
Journal of Range ManagementDOI
10.2307/3895929Additional Links
https://rangelands.org/Abstract
The effects of 0, 1, 2, and 3 years of grazing deferment after sagebrush control were compared on subalpine ranges of the Big Horn Mountains in Wyoming. On units open to grazing, utilization of Idaho fescue was generally below the level which sustains yield under season-long grazing. Under such conditions, the desirable forage grasses quickly increased in vigor and revegetated the area after sagebrush was killed. Continued moderate utilization did not retard the revegetation process or influence the subsequent reinvasion of sagebrush.Type
Articletext
Language
enISSN
0022-409Xae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.2307/3895929