Issue Date
1965-09-01Keywords
infiltration ratesPoa pratensis
Moisture Utilization
Unburned Range
Beef Gains
burning
Andropogon scoparius
Bouteloua curtipendula
Andropogon gerardii
fall
Kentucky bluegrass
advantages
Disadvantages
seasons
little bluestem
big bluestem
switchgrass
Indiangrass
Kansas
Flint Hills
Manhattan
forage yield
soil moisture
spring
sideoats grama
Sorghastrum nutans
Panicum virgatum
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
McMurphy, W. E., & Anderson, K. L. (1965). Burning flint hills range. Journal of Range Management, 18(5), 265-269.Publisher
Society for Range ManagementJournal
Journal of Range ManagementDOI
10.2307/3895495Additional Links
https://rangelands.org/Abstract
Late spring burning on May 1 was less detrimental than burning in fall or in early or mid-spring. Late spring burning, however, reduced infiltration rate, soil moisture, and forage yield, as compared with unburned range. Advantages of late spring burning over not burning were an increase in big bluestem, control of Kentucky bluegrass and other less desirable plants, and more rapid beef gains.Type
Articletext
Language
enISSN
0022-409Xae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.2307/3895495