Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorQiu, Xiaohe
dc.contributor.authorWen, Lala
dc.contributor.authorWu, Changxu
dc.contributor.authorYang, Zhen
dc.contributor.authorWang, Qijun
dc.contributor.authorLi, Hongting
dc.contributor.authorWang, Duming
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-04T20:14:43Z
dc.date.available2021-01-04T20:14:43Z
dc.date.issued2020-06-16
dc.identifier.citationQiu, X., Wen, L., Wu, C., Yang, Z., Wang, Q., Li, H., & Wang, D. (2020). Impact of Learning Methods on Spatial Knowledge Acquisition. Frontiers in Psychology, 11.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1664-1078
dc.identifier.pmid32612561
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01322
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/650617
dc.description.abstractResearch on the acquisition of spatial knowledge not only enriches our understanding of the theory of spatial knowledge representation but also creates practical value for the application of spatial knowledge. The aim of this study is to understand the impact of different learning methods on the acquisition of spatial knowledge, including the role of 2D maps, the difference between physical interaction and virtual interaction, and whether passive learning can replace active learning in virtual environments. One experiment was conducted, in which landmark knowledge and configurational knowledge were measured. Results indicate that 2D maps play a supporting role in acquiring both landmark knowledge and configurational knowledge. In addition, physical learning was associated with better spatial knowledge representation compared with virtual learning. An analysis of observational data in the third comparison found no significant difference between passive learning and active learning using virtual street view maps. However, with high-quality learning materials, passive learning can contribute to the acquisition of spatial knowledge more efficiently than active learning.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherFRONTIERS MEDIA SAen_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2020 Qiu, Wen, Wu, Yang, Wang, Li and Wang. This an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY).en_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectspatial knowledgeen_US
dc.subjectlearning methodsen_US
dc.subjectfield navigation learningen_US
dc.subject2D map-assisted field navigation learningen_US
dc.subjectvirtual street view map learningen_US
dc.subjectactive learningen_US
dc.subjectpassive learningen_US
dc.titleImpact of Learning Methods on Spatial Knowledge Acquisitionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentUniv Arizona, Dept Syst & Ind Engn, Coll Engnen_US
dc.identifier.journalFRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGYen_US
dc.description.noteOpen access journalen_US
dc.description.collectioninformationThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.en_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.source.journaltitleFrontiers in psychology
dc.source.volume11
dc.source.beginpage1322
dc.source.endpage
refterms.dateFOA2021-01-04T20:14:58Z
dc.source.countrySwitzerland


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
fpsyg-11-01322.pdf
Size:
3.932Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Copyright © 2020 Qiu, Wen, Wu, Yang, Wang, Li and Wang. This an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY).
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright © 2020 Qiu, Wen, Wu, Yang, Wang, Li and Wang. This an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY).