Response to Ipilimumab/Nivolumab Rechallenge and BRAF Inhibitor/MEK Inhibitor Rechallenge in a Patient with Advanced Metastatic Melanoma Previously Treated with BRAF Targeted Therapy and Immunotherapy
Publisher
HINDAWI LTDCitation
Myrdal, C. N., & Sundararajan, S. (2020). Response to Ipilimumab/Nivolumab Rechallenge and BRAF Inhibitor/MEK Inhibitor Rechallenge in a Patient with Advanced Metastatic Melanoma Previously Treated with BRAF Targeted Therapy and Immunotherapy. Case Reports in Oncological Medicine, 2020.Rights
Copyright © 2020 Caitlyn N. Myrdal and Srinath Sundararajan. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Little is known about the optimal sequencing of targeted therapy and immunotherapy in the treatment of patients with BRAFV600-mutated metastatic melanoma. BRAF/MEK inhibition often has the benefit of rapid disease regression; however, resistance is frequently seen with long-term use. Treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors offers the potential for long-term response but displays a lower rate of objective response. The benefit of synergy between therapies is apparent; however, there is limited data regarding optimal sequencing in the treatment of advanced melanoma. We present the case of a 62-year-old gentleman with advanced BRAFV600-mutated melanoma who followed an unconventional treatment path. After progressing on single-agent vemurafenib, he had response to multiple modalities of immunotherapy before progression. After, he had a substantial response to multiple BRAF/MEK inhibitor rechallenges before developing resistance. The patient is now stable after a retrial of combination immunotherapy. Our case illustrates that with the right sequencing of therapy, meaningful clinical responses can be elicited with rechallenging of targeted therapy and immunotherapy in metastatic melanoma.Note
Open access journalISSN
2090-6706PubMed ID
32670650Version
Final published versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1155/2020/4392562
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright © 2020 Caitlyn N. Myrdal and Srinath Sundararajan. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License.
Related articles
- Case Report: Rechallenge With BRAF and MEK Inhibitors in Metastatic Melanoma: A Further Therapeutic Option in Salvage Setting?
- Authors: Stagno A, Vari S, Annovazzi A, Anelli V, Russillo M, Cognetti F, Ferraresi V
- Issue date: 2021
- A Dramatic Response to Second-Line Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in BRAF-V600-Mutated Metastatic Melanoma.
- Authors: Fedele D, Moroso S, Turoldo A, Bazzocchi G, Conforti C, Zalaudek I, Guglielmi A
- Issue date: 2024 Jan-Dec
- Atezolizumab, cobimetinib, and vemurafenib as first-line treatment for unresectable metastatic BRAF V600 mutated melanoma.
- Authors: Schmitt AM, Dumas L, Larkin J
- Issue date: 2022 Jan
- Current and future roles of targeted therapy and immunotherapy in advanced melanoma.
- Authors: Olszanski AJ
- Issue date: 2014 Apr
- Clinical Predictors of Survival in Patients With BRAFV600-Mutated Metastatic Melanoma Treated With Combined BRAF and MEK Inhibitors After Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.
- Authors: Kahn AM, Perry CJ, Etts K, Kluger H, Sznol M
- Issue date: 2024 Apr 4