Name:
Predictors_of_client_retention.pdf
Size:
471.9Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Accepted Manuscript
Affiliation
Univ Arizona, Coll Med, Dept Family & Community MedUniv Arizona, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Mel & Enid Zuckerman Coll Publ Hlth
Univ Arizona, Hlth Promot Sci, Mel & Enid Zuckerman Coll Publ Hlth
Issue Date
2020-03-09
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESSCitation
Nair, U. S., Rabe, B., Brady, B. R., & Bell, M. L. (2020). Predictors of client retention in a state-based tobacco quitline. Journal of Smoking Cessation, 15(2), 67-75.Journal
JOURNAL OF SMOKING CESSATIONRights
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Introduction. Quitlines are standard care for smoking cessation; however, retaining clients in services is a problem. Little is known about factors that may predict dropout. Aims. To examine predictors of retention while in-program and at follow-up for clients enrolling in a state quitline. Methods. This was a retrospective analysis of quitline enrolled clients from 2011 to 2017 (N= 49,347). Client retention in-program was categorized as (a) low adherence to treatment (receiving zero coaching calls), moderate (1-2 calls), and high adherence (3+ calls). Dropout at follow-up included participants who were not reached for the 7-month follow-up. Results. More than half the sample dropped out during treatment; 61% were not reached for follow-up. Women (odds ratio (OR) = 1.21; 95% confidence interval (CI) = [1.16, 127]) and those with high levels of nicotine dependence (OR = 1.03; 95% CI = [1.02, 1.04]) were more likely to have moderate adherence to treatment (1-2 coaching calls). Dropout at follow-up was more likely among clients who used nicotine replacement therapy (OR = 1.14; 95% CI = [1.09, 1.19]) and less likely among those who had high treatment adherence (OR = 0.41; 95% CI = [0.39, 0.42]). Conclusion. Given the relapsing nature of tobacco use and the harms related to tobacco use, quitlines can improve their impact by offering tailored services to enhance client engagement and retention in-treatment and at follow-up.Note
6 month embargo; published 9 March 2020ISSN
1834-2612EISSN
1834-2612Version
Final accepted manuscriptae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1017/jsc.2020.10
