Documentation of individualized preoperative risk assessment: a multi-center study
Name:
s13741-020-00156-2.pdf
Size:
529.5Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version
Author
Bloomstone, Joshua AHouseman, Benjamin T
Sande, Evora Vicents
Brantley, Ann
Curran, Jessica
Maccioli, Gerald A
Haddad, Tania
Steinshouer, James
Walker, David
Moonesinghe, Ramani
Affiliation
Univ Arizona, Coll Med, Dept AnesthesiolIssue Date
2020-09-21Keywords
Individual risk assessmentSurgical risk assessment
Perioperative risk assessment
Risk score
Risk tool
Population risk
Individual risk
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
BMCCitation
Bloomstone, J. A., Houseman, B. T., Sande, E. V., Brantley, A., Curran, J., Maccioli, G. A., ... & Moonesinghe, R. (2020). Documentation of individualized preoperative risk assessment: a multi-center study. Perioperative Medicine, 9(1), 1-8.Journal
PERIOPERATIVE MEDICINERights
© The Author(s) 2020. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Seven hundred fifty-six of 140,756 inpatient charts met inclusion criteria (0.54%, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.58%). ISRAs were documented by 16.08% of surgeons and 4.76% of anesthesiologists (p < 0.0001, 95% CI -0.002 to 0.228). Cardiac surgeons documented ISRAs more frequently than non-cardiac surgeons (25.87% vs 16.15%) [p = 0.0086, R-squared = 0.970%]. Elective surgical patients were more likely than emergency surgical patients (19.57 vs 12.03%) to have risk documented (p = 0.023, R-squared = 0.730%). Patients over the age of 65 were more likely than patients under the age of 65 to have ISRA documentation (20.31 vs 14.61%) [p = 0.043, R-squared = 0.580%]. Only 10 of 756 (1.3%) records included documentation of a named ISRA tool.Note
Open access journalISSN
2047-0525PubMed ID
32974010Version
Final published versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1186/s13741-020-00156-2
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © The Author(s) 2020. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Related articles
- [Analysis and options for optimization of preoperative assessment for anesthesia at a university hospital].
- Authors: Kieninger M, Eissnert C, Seitz M, Judemann K, Seyfried T, Graf B, Sinner B
- Issue date: 2018 Feb
- Assessment of attitudes towards future implementation of the "Surgical Risk Preoperative Assessment System" (SURPAS) tool: a pilot survey among patients, surgeons, and hospital administrators.
- Authors: Lambert-Kerzner A, Ford KL, Hammermeister KE, Henderson WG, Bronsert MR, Meguid RA
- Issue date: 2018
- Patient-Centered Anesthesia Triage System Predicts ASA Physical Status.
- Authors: Enneking FK, Radhakrishnan NS, Berg K, Patel S, Wishin JM, Vasilopoulos T
- Issue date: 2017 Jun
- Use of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Surgical Risk Calculator During Preoperative Risk Discussion: The Patient Perspective.
- Authors: Raymond BL, Wanderer JP, Hawkins AT, Geiger TM, Ehrenfeld JM, Stokes JW, McEvoy MD
- Issue date: 2019 Apr